Suppr超能文献

在不同背景的有资质的急诊科医生中,成功进行腹部主动脉的超声可视化检查差异显著。

Successful sonographic visualisation of the abdominal aorta differs significantly among a diverse group of credentialed emergency department providers.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, B-Building, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2011 Jun;28(6):472-6. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.086462. Epub 2010 Aug 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were to examine the association between emergency department (ED) providers' experience with bedside ultrasound after achieving credentialing for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sonography, and their successful visualisation rate of the abdominal aorta among consecutive patients who presented asymptomatically but with risk factors for AAA.

METHODS

Study coordinators enrolled asymptomatic men > 50 years presenting to a single ED with AAA risk factors. One of 20 AAA credentialed ED sonographers screened each subject for AAA. Screening forms and ultrasound images were reviewed for quality assurance. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate OR of visualisation and correct measurement among providers with varying experience, adjusted for bowel gas and body mass index (BMI).

RESULTS

During the 12 week enrolment, 278 patients were eligible and 196 (70%) enrolled. ED sonographers accurately visualised the entire abdominal aorta of 140 subjects (71.4%), did not completely visualise 40 (20.4%) and incorrectly measured 16 (8.2%). After controlling for bowel gas and BMI, providers with < 1 year of experience (OR 6.7, 95% CI 2.0 to 22.2) and with 1-3 years experience post credentialing for AAA (OR 9.6, 95% CI 2.2 to 43.2) were significantly less likely to visualise and accurately measure the aorta compared to providers with >3 years experience.

CONCLUSION

AAA sonography performance varied markedly among a diverse group of already credential ED sonographers. The most experienced providers demonstrated best performance. The present results suggest that some providers might require > 25 proctored scans to ensure competency and training, and training on technically difficult patients should be part of the credentialing process.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨在获得腹部主动脉瘤(AAA)超声检查认证后,急诊(ED)医生在床边使用超声的经验与连续就诊的、有 AAA 风险因素但无症状患者的腹主动脉可视性之间的关系。

方法

研究协调员招募了有 AAA 风险因素的、无症状的 50 岁以上男性到单个 ED 就诊。20 名 AAA 认证的 ED 超声医生中的一名对每个患者进行 AAA 筛查。筛查表格和超声图像用于质量保证审查。使用多变量逻辑回归估计经验不同的提供者中可视化和正确测量的比值比(OR),并针对肠气和体重指数(BMI)进行调整。

结果

在 12 周的招募期间,有 278 名患者符合条件,其中 196 名(70%)入组。ED 超声医生准确地可视化了 140 名患者(71.4%)的整个腹主动脉,未能完全可视化 40 名患者(20.4%)和错误测量 16 名患者(8.2%)。在控制肠气和 BMI 后,经验<1 年(OR 6.7,95%CI 2.0 至 22.2)和获得 AAA 认证后 1-3 年(OR 9.6,95%CI 2.2 至 43.2)的提供者与经验>3 年的提供者相比,可视化和准确测量主动脉的可能性明显降低。

结论

在已经认证的 ED 超声医生中,AAA 超声检查表现差异很大。经验最丰富的提供者表现最好。目前的结果表明,一些提供者可能需要>25 次有监督的扫描来确保能力和培训,并且在有技术难度的患者上进行培训应该是认证过程的一部分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验