Department of Medical Morphological Research, Section of Forensic Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Forensic Sci Int. 2011 Jan 30;204(1-3):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.04.039. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
The lack of reliable laboratory biomarkers and common standard definitions of signs and symptoms represents the main problem for clinicians when a suspected anaphylactic event must be diagnosed, while a post-mortem diagnosis of anaphylaxis is often a very difficult task in forensic medicine. Significant necroscopic signs as well as the data reported from witnesses or medical records may be absent, biological fluids as blood or urine may be unavailable or under thanatological modifications. The aim of this review is to focus on the diagnostic difficulties with which coroners and forensic pathologists have to cope when a confirmation of anaphylactic death is required by judicial authorities. Investigation methods for a prudent forensic diagnosis of anaphylactic death as well as the need of new potential laboratory or histological investigation techniques coming from immunological research are discussed too.
当必须诊断疑似过敏反应事件时,缺乏可靠的实验室生物标志物和常见的体征和症状的标准定义是临床医生面临的主要问题,而过敏反应的法医死后诊断在法医学中通常是一项非常困难的任务。尸检时可能没有明显的尸检迹象,也没有目击者或医疗记录报告的数据,血液或尿液等生物液体可能无法获得或已经经过尸僵等死后变化。本文的目的是重点讨论法医和法医病理学家在司法机关要求确认过敏反应死亡时必须应对的诊断困难。本文还讨论了用于过敏反应死亡谨慎法医诊断的调查方法,以及免疫研究中新的潜在实验室或组织学研究技术的必要性。