Suppr超能文献

CANVAS1 和 2 综合分析:3 期、多中心、随机、双盲研究,评估头孢洛林与万古霉素加氨曲南治疗复杂性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的安全性和疗效。

Integrated analysis of CANVAS 1 and 2: phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ceftaroline versus vancomycin plus aztreonam in complicated skin and skin-structure infection.

机构信息

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina 27715, USA.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Sep 15;51(6):641-50. doi: 10.1086/655827.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a common cause of complicated skin and skin-structure infection (cSSSI). Increasing antimicrobial resistance in cSSSI has led to a need for new safe and effective therapies. Ceftaroline was evaluated as treatment for cSSSI in 2 identical phase 3 clinical trials, the pooled analysis of which is presented here. The primary objective of each trial was to determine the noninferiority of the clinical cure rate achieved with ceftaroline monotherapy, compared with that achieved with vancomycin plus aztreonam combination therapy, in the clinically evaluable (CE) and modified intent-to-treat (MITT) patient populations.

METHODS

Adult patients with cSSSI requiring intravenous therapy received ceftaroline (600 mg every 12 h) or vancomycin plus aztreonam (1 g each every 12 h) for 5-14 days.

RESULTS

Of 1378 patients enrolled in both trials, 693 received ceftaroline and 685 received vancomycin plus aztreonam. Baseline characteristics of the treatment groups were comparable. Clinical cure rates were similar for ceftaroline and vancomycin plus aztreonam in the CE (91.6% vs 92.7%) and MITT (85.9% vs 85.5%) populations, respectively, as well as in patients infected with MRSA (93.4% vs 94.3%). The rates of adverse events, discontinuations because of an adverse event, serious adverse events, and death also were similar between treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Ceftaroline achieved high clinical cure rates, was efficacious against cSSSI caused by MRSA and other common cSSSI pathogens, and was well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with the cephalosporin class. Ceftaroline has the potential to provide a monotherapy alternative for the treatment of cSSSI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00424190 for CANVAS 1 and NCT00423657 for CANVAS 2.

摘要

背景

耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)是一种常见的复杂性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(cSSSI)的病原体。cSSSI 中不断增加的抗菌药物耐药性导致需要新的安全有效的治疗方法。头孢洛林已被评估用于治疗 2 项相同的 III 期临床研究中的 cSSSI,现将其汇总分析结果呈现如下。每个试验的主要目的是确定头孢洛林单药治疗与万古霉素加氨曲南联合治疗在临床可评估(CE)和改良意向治疗(MITT)患者人群中的临床治愈率的非劣效性。

方法

需要静脉治疗的 cSSSI 成年患者接受头孢洛林(每 12 小时 600mg)或万古霉素加氨曲南(每 12 小时 1g)治疗 5-14 天。

结果

在这两项试验中,共有 1378 例患者入组,其中 693 例接受头孢洛林治疗,685 例接受万古霉素加氨曲南治疗。治疗组的基线特征具有可比性。头孢洛林和万古霉素加氨曲南在 CE(91.6% vs 92.7%)和 MITT(85.9% vs 85.5%)人群中的临床治愈率相似,在感染 MRSA 的患者中也相似(93.4% vs 94.3%)。两组之间不良反应、因不良反应停药、严重不良事件和死亡的发生率也相似。

结论

头孢洛林达到了较高的临床治愈率,对由 MRSA 和其他常见 cSSSI 病原体引起的 cSSSI 有效,且具有良好的耐受性,安全性与头孢菌素类一致。头孢洛林有可能成为治疗 cSSSI 的单一疗法替代药物。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:CANVAS 1 为 NCT00424190,CANVAS 2 为 NCT00423657。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验