Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Feb;37(1):12-22. doi: 10.1037/a0019251.
Ample evidence suggests that global perception may involve low spatial frequency (LSF) processing and that local perception may involve high spatial frequency (HSF) processing (Shulman, Sullivan, Gish, & Sakoda, 1986; Shulman & Wilson, 1987; Robertson, 1996). It is debated whether SF selection is a low-level mechanism associating global and local information with absolute LSF and HSF content, or whether it is a higher level mechanism involving a selective process that defines the SF range in which global and local can then be relatively defined. The present study provides support for the latter claim by demonstrating that allocating attention to global or local levels of hierarchical displays biased selection of LSFs or HSFs, respectively, in subsequently presented compound gratings. This bias occurred despite a change in the response dimension (from letter identification in the hierarchical stimulus to orientation discrimination in the grating) and despite a difference in retinal location of the hierarchical stimuli and the grating stimulus. Moreover, the bias was determined by the relationship between the 2 SFs in the compound grating (i.e., their relative frequency) rather than the absolute SF values.
大量证据表明,整体感知可能涉及低空间频率(LSF)处理,局部感知可能涉及高空间频率(HSF)处理(Shulman、Sullivan、Gish 和 Sakoda,1986;Shulman 和 Wilson,1987;Robertson,1996)。目前尚不清楚 SF 选择是一种将全局和局部信息与绝对 LSF 和 HSF 内容相关联的低级机制,还是一种涉及选择性过程的高级机制,该过程定义了全局和局部可以相对定义的 SF 范围。本研究通过证明在随后呈现的复合光栅中,将注意力分配到层次显示的全局或局部水平会分别偏向 LSF 或 HSF 的选择,从而为后一种说法提供了支持。这种偏差发生在响应维度发生变化(从层次刺激中的字母识别到光栅中的方向辨别)以及层次刺激和光栅刺激的视网膜位置不同的情况下。此外,这种偏差取决于复合光栅中两种 SF(即它们的相对频率)之间的关系,而不是绝对 SF 值。