Levin Mark D, Stephens Paul, Tanel Ronn E, Vetter Victoria L, Rhodes Larry A
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Cardiol Young. 2010 Dec;20(6):641-7. doi: 10.1017/S1047951110000867. Epub 2010 Aug 20.
We evaluated the presentation, treatment, and outcome of infants who present with ventricular tachycardia in the first year of life. Seventy-six infants were admitted to our institution with a diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia between January, 1987 and May, 2006. Forty-five infants were excluded from the study because of additional confounding diagnoses including accelerated idioventricular rhythm, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, supraventricular tachycardia with aberrancy, long QT syndrome, cardiac rhabdomyoma, myocarditis, congenital lesions, or incomplete data. The remaining 31 included infants who had a median age at presentation of 1 day, with a range from 1 to 255 days, and a mean ventricular tachycardia rate of 213 beats per minute, with a range from 171 to 280, at presentation. The infants were treated chronically with propranolol (38.7%), amiodarone (12.9%), mexiletine (3.2%), propranolol and mexiletine (9.7%), or propranolol and procainamide (6.5%). The median duration of treatment was 13 months, with a range from 3 to 105 months. Ventricular tachycardia resolved spontaneously in all infants. No patient died, or received catheter ablation or device therapy. Median age at last ventricular tachycardia was 59 days, with a range from 1 to 836 days. Mean follow-up was 45 months, with a range from 5 to 164 months, with a mean ventricular tachycardia-free period of 40 months. Infants with asymptomatic ventricular tachycardia, a structurally normal heart, and no additional electrophysiological diagnosis all had spontaneous resolution of tachycardia. Furthermore, log-rank analysis of the time to ventricular tachycardia resolution showed no difference between children who received chronic outpatient anti-arrhythmic treatment and those who had no such therapy. While indications for therapy cannot be determined from this study, lack of symptoms or myocardial dysfunction suggests that therapy may not be necessary.
我们评估了出生后第一年出现室性心动过速的婴儿的临床表现、治疗及预后情况。1987年1月至2006年5月期间,76名诊断为室性心动过速的婴儿被收治入我院。45名婴儿因存在其他混杂诊断被排除在研究之外,这些混杂诊断包括加速性室性自主心律、预激综合征、伴差异性传导的室上性心动过速、长QT综合征、心脏横纹肌瘤、心肌炎、先天性病变或数据不完整。其余31名婴儿纳入研究,其就诊时的中位年龄为1天,范围为1至255天,就诊时室性心动过速的平均心率为每分钟213次,范围为171至280次。这些婴儿长期接受普萘洛尔(38.7%)、胺碘酮(12.9%)、美西律(3.2%)、普萘洛尔和美西律(9.7%)或普萘洛尔和普鲁卡因胺(6.5%)治疗。治疗的中位持续时间为13个月,范围为3至105个月。所有婴儿的室性心动过速均自发缓解。无患者死亡,也未接受导管消融或器械治疗。最后一次室性心动过速发作时的中位年龄为59天,范围为1至836天。平均随访时间为45个月,范围为5至164个月,无室性心动过速的平均时长为40个月。无症状性室性心动过速、心脏结构正常且无其他电生理诊断的婴儿,其心动过速均自发缓解。此外,对室性心动过速缓解时间的对数秩分析显示,接受慢性门诊抗心律失常治疗的儿童与未接受此类治疗的儿童之间无差异。虽然本研究无法确定治疗指征,但无症状或心肌功能正常提示可能无需治疗。