Centre for Rural Economy, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
Public Adm. 2010;88(2):331-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01831.x.
For the past decade, the policy community/issue network typology of pressure group interaction has been used to explain policy outcomes and the policy-making process. To re-examine the validity of this typology, the paper focuses on the UK government's response to the 2001 Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) crisis, and in particular the decision to pursue contiguous culling rather than vaccination to overcome the epidemic. Rather than illustrating the emergence of an issue network in agricultural policy, the decision-making process of the FMD outbreak demonstrates continuity with prior crises. In addition, the politicization of scientific expertise is identified as an emerging trend in crisis management. Policy framing is used to explain the impetus behind the contiguous cull decision, concluding that the legacy of previous policy choices conditioned the crisis response to a far greater degree than contemporaneous pressure group action.
在过去的十年中,政策共同体/问题网络类型学一直被用来解释政策结果和决策过程。为了重新检验这种类型学的有效性,本文聚焦于英国政府对 2001 年口蹄疫(FMD)危机的应对,特别是决定采用连续扑杀而不是疫苗接种来控制疫情。FMD 疫情的决策过程并没有说明农业政策中出现了问题网络,而是与之前的危机保持了连续性。此外,科学专业知识的政治化被确定为危机管理中的一个新趋势。政策框架用于解释连续扑杀决定的背后推动力,结论是,之前政策选择的遗留问题比对当前压力团体行动的影响要大得多,从而影响了危机应对。