Suppr超能文献

“照顾患者”:退伍军人健康管理局人员使用临床信息系统的经验定性分析。

'To take care of the patients': Qualitative analysis of Veterans Health Administration personnel experiences with a clinical informatics system.

机构信息

Health Services Research and Development Northwest Center of Excellence for Outcomes Research in Older Adults, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2010 Aug 20;5:63. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-63.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Veterans Health Administration (VA) has invested significant resources in designing and implementing a comprehensive electronic health record (EHR) that supports clinical priorities. EHRs in general have been difficult to implement, with unclear cost-effectiveness. We describe VA clinical personnel interactions with and evaluations of the EHR.

METHODS

As part of an evaluation of a quality improvement initiative, we interviewed 72 VA clinicians and managers using a semi-structured interview format. We conducted a qualitative analysis of interview transcripts, examining themes relating to participants' interactions with and evaluations of the VA EHR.

RESULTS

Participants described their perceptions of the positive and negative effects of the EHR on their clinical workflow. Although they appreciated the speed and ease of documentation that the EHR afforded, they were concerned about the time cost of using the technology and the technology's potential for detracting from interpersonal interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

VA personnel value EHRs' contributions to supporting communication, education, and documentation. However, participants are concerned about EHRs' potential interference with other important aspects of healthcare, such as time for clinical care and interpersonal communication with patients and colleagues. We propose that initial implementation of an EHR is one step in an iterative process of ongoing quality improvement.

摘要

背景

退伍军人健康管理局(VA)投入了大量资源来设计和实施支持临床重点的综合电子健康记录(EHR)。一般来说,EHR 实施困难,成本效益不明确。我们描述了 VA 临床人员与 EHR 的交互作用和评估。

方法

作为一项质量改进计划评估的一部分,我们采用半结构化访谈形式对 72 名 VA 临床医生和管理人员进行了访谈。我们对访谈记录进行了定性分析,研究了与参与者与 VA EHR 交互作用和评估相关的主题。

结果

参与者描述了他们对 EHR 对其临床工作流程的积极和消极影响的看法。尽管他们赞赏 EHR 提供的文档记录速度和便利性,但他们担心使用技术的时间成本以及技术对人际互动的潜在影响。

结论

VA 人员重视 EHR 对支持沟通、教育和文档记录的贡献。然而,参与者担心 EHR 可能会干扰医疗保健的其他重要方面,例如临床护理时间和与患者及同事的人际沟通。我们提出,EHR 的初始实施是持续质量改进的迭代过程中的一个步骤。

相似文献

2
EHR implementation in a new clinic: a case study of clinician perceptions.
J Med Syst. 2013 Aug;37(4):9955. doi: 10.1007/s10916-013-9955-2. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
3
Practicing Clinicians' Recommendations to Reduce Burden from the Electronic Health Record Inbox: a Mixed-Methods Study.
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Sep;34(9):1825-1832. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05112-5. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
4
Assessing Electronic Health Record (EHR) Use during a Major EHR Transition: An Innovative Mixed Methods Approach.
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Oct;38(Suppl 4):999-1006. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08318-w. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
6
Electronic Health Record Challenges, Workarounds, and Solutions Observed in Practices Integrating Behavioral Health and Primary Care.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;28 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S63-72. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150133.
7
Electronic health record-supported implementation of an evidence-based pathway for perioperative surgical care.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Feb 16;31(3):591-599. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad237.
8
VA Provider Perspectives on Coordinating COPD Care Across Health Systems.
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 May;34(Suppl 1):37-42. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04971-2.

引用本文的文献

1
A survey of chiropractic intern experiences learning and using an electronic health record system.
J Chiropr Educ. 2018 Oct;32(2):145-151. doi: 10.7899/JCE-17-14. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
2
The journey through grief: insights from a qualitative study of electronic health record implementation.
Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr;50(2):462-88. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12227. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
3
An analysis of electronic health record-related patient safety concerns.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):1053-9. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002578. Epub 2014 Jun 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Roles of managers, frontline staff and local champions, in implementing quality improvement: stakeholders' perspectives.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Feb;18(1):63-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01518.x. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
2
Hospital computing and the costs and quality of care: a national study.
Am J Med. 2010 Jan;123(1):40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.09.004. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
3
Primary care visit duration and quality: does good care take longer?
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Nov 9;169(20):1866-72. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.341.
4
Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 16;360(16):1628-38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0900592. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
6
Patient-provider communication: understanding diabetes management among adult females.
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Jul;76(1):31-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.022. Epub 2009 Jan 20.
7
Organizational cost of quality improvement for depression care.
Health Serv Res. 2009 Feb;44(1):225-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00911.x.
9
Information needs, Infobutton Manager use, and satisfaction by clinician type: a case study.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jan-Feb;16(1):140-2. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2746. Epub 2008 Oct 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验