Suppr超能文献

这已经足够接近了——时间间隔对风险、任务难度、努力和舒适度的体验存在阈值效应。

That's close enough--a threshold effect of time headway on the experience of risk, task difficulty, effort, and comfort.

机构信息

Traffic and Environmental Psychology Group, Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712TS, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):1926-33. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.05.014. Epub 2010 Jun 8.

Abstract

Subjective impressions of task difficulty, risk, effort, and comfort are key variables of several theories of driver behaviour. A point of difference between many of these theories is not only the importance of these variables, but also whether they are continuously present and monitored or only experienced by individuals at certain critical points in the driving task. Both a threshold relationship and evidence of constant monitoring of risk and task difficulty have been found for speed choice. In light of these conflicting findings this study seeks to examine a different part of the driving task, the choice of time headway. Participants (N=40, aged 19 to 30) drove in a simulator behind a vehicle travelling at 50 km/h at set time headways ranging from 0.5 seconds to 4.0 seconds. After each drive ratings of task difficulty, risk, comfort, and effort were collected. In addition participants were asked to drive at the time headway they preferred. In order to assess familiarity participants also drove on both the left and right hand side of the road and the role of driving experience was also examined. The results show support for a threshold awareness of task difficulty, risk, effort, and comfort in relation to time headway. Participant's ratings of these variables tended to be low or nil at large time headways, but then around the 2.0 second mark began to noticeably increase. Feelings of task difficulty, risk, and effort were also found to be highly correlated with each other. No effect of driving experience or side of the road was found.

摘要

主观感受任务难度、风险、努力和舒适度是几个驾驶员行为理论的关键变量。这些理论之间的一个区别不仅在于这些变量的重要性,还在于它们是持续存在并被监测的,还是仅在驾驶任务的某些关键节点被个体体验到。对于速度选择,已经发现了与阈值关系和风险与任务难度持续监测的证据。鉴于这些相互矛盾的发现,本研究试图研究驾驶任务的不同部分,即时间间隔的选择。参与者(N=40,年龄 19 至 30 岁)在模拟器中以 50 公里/小时的速度跟随一辆车辆行驶,设定的时间间隔从 0.5 秒到 4.0 秒不等。每次驾驶后,参与者都会对任务难度、风险、舒适度和努力程度进行评分。此外,参与者还被要求以他们喜欢的时间间隔进行驾驶。为了评估熟悉程度,参与者还在道路的左右两侧驾驶,并检查了驾驶经验的作用。结果表明,在时间间隔方面,对任务难度、风险、努力和舒适度的阈值意识得到了支持。参与者对这些变量的评分在较大的时间间隔内往往较低或为零,但在大约 2.0 秒时开始明显增加。还发现任务难度、风险和努力的感觉彼此高度相关。没有发现驾驶经验或道路一侧的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验