Ricordi C, Gray D W, Hering B J, Kaufman D B, Warnock G L, Kneteman N M, Lake S P, London N J, Socci C, Alejandro R
Istituto H. San Raffaele, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy.
Acta Diabetol Lat. 1990 Jul-Sep;27(3):185-95. doi: 10.1007/BF02581331.
Recent progress in islet isolation from the pancreas of large mammals including man, accentuated the need for the development of precise and reproducible techniques to assess islet yield. In this report both quantitative and qualitative criteria for islet isolation assessment were discussed, the main topics being the determination of number, volume, purity, morphologic integrity and in vitro and in vivo function tests of the final islet preparations. It has been recommended that dithizone should be used as a specific stain for immediate detection of islet tissue making it possible to estimate both the total number of islets (dividing them into classes of 50 mu diameter range increments) and the purity of the final preparation. Appropriate morphological assessment should include confirmation of islet identification, assessment of the morphological integrity and of the purity of the islet preparation. The use of fluorometric inclusion and exclusion dyes together have been suggested as a viability assay to simultaneously quantitate the proportion of cells that are intact or damaged. Perifusion of islets with glucose provides a dynamic profile of glucose-mediated insulin release and of the ability of the cells to down regulate insulin secretion after the glycemic challenge is interrupted. Although perifusion data provides a useful guide to islet viability the quantity and kinetics of insulin release do not necessarily predict islet performance after implantation. Therefore, the ultimate test of islet viability is their function after transplantation into a diabetic recipient. For this reason, in vivo models of transplantation of an aliquot of the final islet preparation into diabetic nude (athymic) rodents have been suggested. We hope that these general guidelines will be of assistance to standardize the assessment of islet isolations, making it possible to better interpret and compare procedures from different centers.
从包括人类在内的大型哺乳动物胰腺中分离胰岛的最新进展,凸显了开发精确且可重复的技术以评估胰岛产量的必要性。在本报告中,讨论了胰岛分离评估的定量和定性标准,主要议题包括最终胰岛制剂的数量、体积、纯度、形态完整性以及体外和体内功能测试的测定。有人建议使用双硫腙作为特异性染色剂,以便立即检测胰岛组织,从而能够估计胰岛的总数(将它们分为直径范围以50微米递增的类别)以及最终制剂的纯度。适当的形态学评估应包括胰岛鉴定的确认、胰岛制剂形态完整性和纯度的评估。有人建议将荧光性摄取和排除染料一起用作活力测定法,以同时定量完整或受损细胞的比例。用葡萄糖对胰岛进行灌流可提供葡萄糖介导的胰岛素释放以及血糖挑战中断后细胞下调胰岛素分泌能力的动态概况。尽管灌流数据为胰岛活力提供了有用的指导,但胰岛素释放的量和动力学不一定能预测植入后的胰岛性能。因此,胰岛活力的最终测试是将其移植到糖尿病受体后的功能。出于这个原因,有人建议采用将最终胰岛制剂的一份等分试样移植到糖尿病裸(无胸腺)啮齿动物体内的移植体内模型。我们希望这些通用指南将有助于规范胰岛分离的评估,从而能够更好地解释和比较来自不同中心的程序。