Rutsohn Phil, Kent Cal
Health administration, Graduate School of Management, Marshall University, South Charleston, West Virginia, USA.
Hosp Top. 2010 Jul-Sep;88(3):67-74. doi: 10.1080/00185868.2010.507118.
West Virginia, as is true for the nation as a whole, spends far less on public health interventions than on curative care. In 2008 the United States spent approximately $2.4 trillion on healthcare, of which approximately $72 billion was allocated for public health activities-obviously a very small percentage (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. Department of Heath and Human Services 2010). In West Virginia the 2006 per capita budget allocation for Local Boards of Health (LBH) for Basic Public Health Services was about $6.91, and total public health funding was between $63 and $91 per capita depending on the definition of public health. At the same time, Medicaid expenditures by the State are approximately $269 per capita with total Medicaid expenditures around $995 per capita. The difference in funding for Medicaid is almost 10 times the amount allocated to public health. The funding differences between curative care and preventive care may not be the result of the public's lack of understanding of the benefits of prevention, but rather its focus on short term rather than long term economic benefits. For a state like West Virginia, in which per capita income is below the national average, Medicaid is good business for the State's economy. Far too often public health funding is viewed as a drain from a state's budget not as an economic contributor to the state's economy. As a result, the funding of LBHs is almost always insufficient. The authors were interested in evaluating the economic impact of Local Boards of Health on West Virginia's economy. Although the authors recognize that the greatest economic benefits of public health are the costs averted through prevention and early detection, they believe that if LBH produce a positive economic multiplier State officials may view public health allocations in a more positive light. To assess the impact of LBH in West Virginia, spending data for each was collected. The direct, indirect, and induced spending resulting from public health activity was considered. The results were modeled using the IMPLAN (IMPLAN Professional 1999) regional input-output simulation software to assess the multiplier effects of direct LBH spending. Findings suggest that LBH produce a positive economic multiplier similar to other service industries in West Virginia. The inferences from this investigation focus on West Virginia however it is possible to make a reasonable argument that the fundamental issues are similar for states with similar economies.
与整个美国的情况一样,西弗吉尼亚州在公共卫生干预措施上的支出远低于治疗护理方面的支出。2008年,美国在医疗保健方面的支出约为2.4万亿美元,其中约720亿美元用于公共卫生活动——显然占比非常小(医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心,美国卫生与公众服务部,2010年)。在西弗吉尼亚州,2006年地方卫生局(LBH)用于基本公共卫生服务的人均预算拨款约为6.91美元,根据公共卫生的定义,公共卫生总资金人均在63美元至91美元之间。与此同时,该州的医疗补助支出约为人均269美元,医疗补助总支出约为人均995美元。医疗补助资金与公共卫生拨款的差额几乎是分配给公共卫生资金数额的10倍。治疗护理和预防护理之间的资金差异可能并非公众对预防益处缺乏了解所致,而是因为公众关注短期而非长期经济效益。对于像西弗吉尼亚州这样人均收入低于全国平均水平的州来说,医疗补助对该州经济是件好事。公共卫生资金常常被视为州预算的一项消耗,而非对该州经济的经济贡献因素。因此,地方卫生局的资金几乎总是不足。作者们有兴趣评估地方卫生局对西弗吉尼亚州经济的经济影响。尽管作者们认识到公共卫生最大的经济效益是通过预防和早期发现避免的成本,但他们认为,如果地方卫生局能产生积极的经济乘数效应,州政府官员可能会以更积极的眼光看待公共卫生拨款。为了评估西弗吉尼亚州地方卫生局的影响,收集了每个地方卫生局的支出数据。考虑了公共卫生活动产生的直接、间接和诱导性支出。使用IMPLAN(IMPLAN Professional 1999)区域投入产出模拟软件对结果进行建模,以评估地方卫生局直接支出的乘数效应。研究结果表明,地方卫生局产生的积极经济乘数效应与西弗吉尼亚州的其他服务业类似。这项调查的推论聚焦于西弗吉尼亚州,不过对于经济情况类似的州来说,也可以合理地认为基本问题是相似的。