Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
J Chem Ecol. 2010 Oct;36(10):1148-54. doi: 10.1007/s10886-010-9853-8. Epub 2010 Sep 3.
The timing and duration of approaches by male peachtree borer Synanthedon exitiosa Say (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) to commercial pheromone dispensers placed singly or at high density in peach orchards was determined by using field-deployed video cameras and digital video recorders. Cameras were trained on one dispenser, and one standard lure was placed in a peach orchard, and on 12 dispensers in a separate orchard where dispensers for mating disruption had been placed at 371 per hectare. Male moth approaches were video recorded at the peak of peachtree borer annual flight, from 13 to 18 August 2009. The mean approach timing (h:min:sec±SD) during the study period was 11:33:12 ± 00:46:43, 11:43:52 ± 00:45:58, and 11:41:21 ± 00:45:54 AM with the single dispenser, high-density dispensers, and lure, respectively. Day-to-day variability in approach timings suggested that there were no biologically significant differences among treatments. The frequency distribution of approach durations varied among treatments, as the high-density dispensers had mostly short approaches, while the distribution of approaches to the single dispenser and lure was wider. The median (interquartile range) approach duration was 3 (2-4), 1 (1-2), and 4 (2-6) seconds with the single dispenser, high-density dispensers, and lure, respectively. The relative rank of median approach durations was constant throughout the period, indicating differences among treatments. This study showed that the presence of pheromone dispensers for mating disruption did not cause an advancement of peachtree borer diel rhythm of response. Shorter approaches to dispensers placed at high density than singly suggest that dispenser retentiveness is not constant with peachtree borer, which may bias estimates of disruption activity as a function of dispenser density.
雄性桃蛀果蛾 Synanthedon exitiosa Say(鳞翅目:卷蛾科)接近单个或高密度放置在桃园中的商业性信息素诱捕器的时间和持续时间,通过使用野外部署的摄像机和数字视频记录器来确定。摄像机针对一个诱捕器进行了训练,一个标准诱芯被放置在一个桃园中,而在另一个果园中则放置了 12 个诱捕器,其中在每公顷 371 个诱捕器中放置了交配干扰诱捕器。在 2009 年 8 月 13 日至 18 日的桃蛀果蛾年度飞行高峰期,对雄蛾的接近进行了视频记录。在研究期间,平均接近时间(h:min:sec±SD)分别为 11:33:12 ± 00:46:43、11:43:52 ± 00:45:58 和 11:41:21 ± 00:45:54 AM,分别为单个诱捕器、高密度诱捕器和诱芯。接近时间的日变化表明,处理之间没有生物学上的显著差异。处理之间的接近持续时间的频率分布不同,高密度诱捕器的接近持续时间主要较短,而单个诱捕器和诱芯的接近分布较宽。单个诱捕器、高密度诱捕器和诱芯的中位数(四分位距)接近持续时间分别为 3(2-4)、1(1-2)和 4(2-6)秒。在整个研究期间,中位数接近持续时间的相对等级保持不变,表明处理之间存在差异。本研究表明,交配干扰信息素诱捕器的存在并没有导致桃蛀果蛾昼夜节律反应的提前。与单个诱捕器相比,高密度放置的诱捕器的接近时间较短,这表明诱捕器的保持力不是与桃蛀果蛾一致的,这可能会使干扰活动的估计值随着诱捕器密度的变化而产生偏差。