Institute for Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), Faculty of Human Sciences and Medical Faculty, University of Cologne & Centre for Health Services Research Cologne (ZVFK), Cologne, Germany.
BMC Public Health. 2010 Sep 13;10:550. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-550.
The Worksite Health Promotion Capacity Instrument (WHPCI) was developed to assess two key factors for effective worksite health promotion: collective willingness and the systematic implementation of health promotion activities in companies. This study evaluates the diagnostic qualities of the WHPCI based on its subscales Health Promotion Willingness and Health Promotion Management, which can be used to place companies into four different categories based on their level of health promotion capacity.
Psychometric evaluation was conducted using exploratory factor and reliability analyses with data taken from a random sample of managers from n = 522 German information and communication technology (ICT) companies. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were conducted to determine further diagnostic qualities of the instrument and to establish the cut-off scores used to determine each company's level of health promotion capacity.
The instrument's subscales, Health Promotion Willingness and Health Promotion Management, are based on one-dimensional constructs, each with very good reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83/0.91). ROC analyses demonstrated satisfactory diagnostic accuracy with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.76 (SE = 0.021; 95% CI 0.72-0.80) for the Health Promotion Willingness scale and 0.81 (SE = 0.021; 95% CI 0.77-0.86) for the Health Promotion Management scale. A cut-off score with good sensitivity (71%/76%) and specificity (69%/75%) was determined for each scale. Both scales were found to have good predictive power and exhibited good efficiency.
Our findings indicate preliminary evidence for the validity and reliability of both subscales of the WHPCI. The goodness of each cut-off score suggests that the scales are appropriate for determining companies' levels of health promotion capacity. Support in implementing (systematic) worksite health promotion can then be tailored to each company's needs based on their current capacity level.
工作场所健康促进能力工具(WHPCI)旨在评估有效开展工作场所健康促进的两个关键因素:集体意愿和公司系统实施健康促进活动的能力。本研究基于其健康促进意愿和健康促进管理两个分量表,评估了 WHPCI 的诊断质量,这两个分量表可用于根据公司的健康促进能力水平将其分为四个不同类别。
采用探索性因子分析和信度分析对来自德国 n = 522 家信息和通信技术(ICT)公司的管理人员的随机样本进行了心理测量评估。进行了接收者操作特征(ROC)分析,以确定该工具的进一步诊断质量,并确定用于确定每家公司健康促进能力水平的截止分数。
该工具的两个分量表,健康促进意愿和健康促进管理,基于单一维度的构建,每个分量表的可靠性都非常好(Cronbach's alpha = 0.83/0.91)。ROC 分析显示,健康促进意愿量表的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.76(SE = 0.021;95%CI 0.72-0.80),健康促进管理量表的 AUC 为 0.81(SE = 0.021;95%CI 0.77-0.86),具有令人满意的诊断准确性。每个量表的最佳截断分数均具有良好的敏感性(71%/76%)和特异性(69%/75%)。两个量表都具有良好的预测能力,且效率较高。
我们的研究结果初步证明了 WHPCI 两个分量表的有效性和可靠性。每个截断分数的优势表明,这些量表适合用于确定公司的健康促进能力水平。然后,可以根据每个公司的当前能力水平,根据其需求提供实施(系统)工作场所健康促进的支持。