Kim Na Rae, Lee Eun Suk, Seong Gong Je, Choi Eun Hee, Hong Samin, Kim Chan Yun
Institute of Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 Sep;128(9):1121-8. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.204.
To evaluate and compare time-domain (Stratus) and spectral-domain (Cirrus; both Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, California) optical coherence tomography (OCT) for the detection of localized retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) defects in patients with open-angle glaucoma.
Patients with localized RNFL defects and age-matched normal control participants were consecutively enrolled from July 1 to December 31, 2008. Sixty-six eyes from 66 patients and 66 eyes from 66 normal controls were imaged with Stratus OCT (fast RNFL scan mode) and Cirrus OCT (optic disc cube mode). The ability to detect the RNFL defect by using quadrant clock-hour maps from both OCTs and a Cirrus OCT deviation map were compared with red-free RNFL photography, which is the criterion standard for visualizing RNFL defects.
The Cirrus OCT deviation map exhibited significantly higher overall sensitivity (92.42%) in detecting the RNFL defects compared with the other maps, which were derived from a 3.46-mm-diameter peripapillary cross-sectional RNFL scan of both OCTs (P < .001). The Cirrus OCT quadrant map had a higher specificity; however, it was not statistically significant (P = .07). Compared with the other maps, the Cirrus OCT derivation map had the lowest cutoff angle for the width (10.69°) of the RNFL defect.
The deviation map from Cirrus OCT was more sensitive in detecting RNFL defects than the clock-hour and quadrant maps derived from cross-sectional peripapillary RNFL measurements by Stratus and Cirrus OCTs. The ability to detect localized RNFL defects on clock-hour or quadrant RNFL maps did not significantly differ between Stratus OCT and Cirrus OCT.
评估并比较时域光学相干断层扫描(Stratus)和频域光学相干断层扫描(Cirrus;均为卡尔蔡司医疗技术公司,加利福尼亚州都柏林)在检测开角型青光眼患者局限性视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)缺损方面的效果。
2008年7月1日至12月31日连续纳入患有局限性RNFL缺损的患者及年龄匹配的正常对照者。对66例患者的66只眼和66名正常对照者的66只眼分别进行Stratus OCT(快速RNFL扫描模式)和Cirrus OCT(视盘立方模式)成像。将两种OCT的象限钟点数图及Cirrus OCT偏差图检测RNFL缺损的能力与无赤光RNFL摄影术进行比较,无赤光RNFL摄影术是可视化RNFL缺损的标准方法。
与来自两种OCT的直径3.46 mm的视乳头周围横断面RNFL扫描得出的其他图相比,Cirrus OCT偏差图在检测RNFL缺损方面显示出显著更高的总体敏感度(92.42%)(P <.001)。Cirrus OCT象限图具有更高的特异度;然而,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.07)。与其他图相比,Cirrus OCT衍生图对RNFL缺损宽度的截断角最低(10.69°)。
与Stratus和Cirrus OCT通过视乳头周围横断面RNFL测量得出的钟点数图和象限图相比,Cirrus OCT的偏差图在检测RNFL缺损方面更敏感。Stratus OCT和Cirrus OCT在通过钟点数或象限RNFL图检测局限性RNFL缺损的能力方面无显著差异。