Suppr超能文献

宾夕法尼亚州教学医院住院医师值班时长限制对创伤中心治疗效果的影响。

The effect of resident duty hour restriction on trauma center outcomes in teaching hospitals in the state of Pennsylvania.

作者信息

Helling Thomas S, Kaswan Sumesh, Boccardo Justin, Bost James E

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center, Johnstown, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2010 Sep;69(3):607-12; discussion 612-3. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e51211.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Resident duty hour restriction was instituted to improve patient safety, but actual impact on patient care is unclear. We sought to determine the effect of duty hour restriction on trauma outcomes in Level I trauma centers (TCs; surgery residency programs) versus Level II TCs (those with no surgery residency programs) within the state of Pennsylvania, using noninferiority as our hypothesis testing.

METHODS

Outcomes (mortality and length of stay [LOS]) were compared in Level II TCs without surgery residencies (n = 7) with Level I TCs (with surgery residencies; n = 14) PRE80 (2001-2003) and POST80 (2004-2007). The subcategories of critically injured patients, Injury Severity Score (ISS) >15, ISS >25, Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) ≤ 50, Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) head/chest/abdomen score >3, age >65 years, mechanism, and shock, functioned as outcome predictors.

RESULTS

There was a decrease in mortality overall PRE80 to POST80 for Level I and II TCs. There was a decrease in mortality in Level I TCs POST80 in ISS >15 (16.5% vs. 14.8%, p = 0.0001), AIS (head) score >3 (20.8% vs. 17.8%, p < 0.0001), age >65 years (12.2% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.0013), and blunt mechanism (5.2% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.0004). LOS was reduced in ISS >15, AIS (head) score >3, age >65 years, and penetrating mechanism in Level I TCs POST80. A similar but more profound decrease was also seen in Level II TCs PRE80 and POST80 (ISS >15, 25; AIS (head) score; shock; blunt mechanism; and TRISS ≤ 50). Testing for inhomogeneity identified less-severely injured patients at Level II TCs POST80 compared with Level I TCs in certain subcategories (ISS >15, 25; AIS (head) score; shock; blunt mechanism; and TRISS ≤ 50) regarding mortality and LOS (TRISS >50%).

CONCLUSIONS

Decreases in mortality and LOS during the study periods were likely not related to resident work hour restriction but rather to overall improvement in outcomes seen at Level II (no residents) and Level I (residents) TCs. Resident work hour restrictions had no discernible effect on patient care (noninferiority).

摘要

背景

实行住院医师值班时间限制旨在提高患者安全,但对患者护理的实际影响尚不清楚。我们试图通过非劣效性假设检验,确定宾夕法尼亚州一级创伤中心(TCs;外科住院医师培训项目)与二级创伤中心(无外科住院医师培训项目)的值班时间限制对创伤治疗结果的影响。

方法

比较了2001 - 2003年(PRE80)和2004 - 2007年(POST80)期间,无外科住院医师培训项目的二级创伤中心(n = 7)与有外科住院医师培训项目的一级创伤中心(n = 14)的治疗结果(死亡率和住院时间[LOS])。重伤患者的亚组,损伤严重程度评分(ISS)>15、ISS>25、创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)≤50、简明损伤定级(AIS)头/胸/腹评分>3、年龄>65岁、致伤机制和休克,作为结果预测指标。

结果

一级和二级创伤中心从PRE80到POST80总体死亡率均有所下降。一级创伤中心在POST80时,ISS>15(16.5%对14.8%,p = 0.0001)、AIS(头部)评分>3(20.8%对17.8%,p < 0.0001)、年龄>65岁(12.2%对10.7%,p = 0.0013)以及钝性致伤机制(5.2%对4.6%,p = 0.0004)的死亡率下降。一级创伤中心在POST80时,ISS>15、AIS(头部)评分>3、年龄>65岁以及穿透性致伤机制的住院时间缩短。二级创伤中心在PRE80和POST80时也出现了类似但更显著的下降(ISS>15、25;AIS(头部)评分;休克;钝性致伤机制;以及TRISS≤50)。不均匀性检验发现,在某些亚组(ISS>15、25;AIS(头部)评分;休克;钝性致伤机制;以及TRISS≤50)中,二级创伤中心POST80时与一级创伤中心相比,伤势较轻的患者在死亡率和住院时间方面(TRISS>50%)存在差异。

结论

研究期间死亡率和住院时间的下降可能与住院医师工作时间限制无关,而是与二级(无住院医师)和一级(有住院医师)创伤中心治疗结果的总体改善有关。住院医师工作时间限制对患者护理没有明显影响(非劣效性)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验