Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Sep 21;8:105. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-105.
The study aimed at presenting normative data for both parallel forms of the "Rasch-based Depression Screening (DESC)", to examine its Rasch model conformity and convergent and divergent validity based on a representative sample of the German general population.
The sample was selected with the assistance of a demographic consulting company applying a face to face interview (N = 2509; mean age = 49.4, SD = 18.2; 55.8% women). Adherence to Rasch model assumptions was determined with analysis of Rasch model fit (infit and outfit), unidimensionality, local independence (principal component factor analysis of the residuals, PCFAR) and differential item functioning (DIF) with regard to participants' age and gender. Norm values were calculated. Convergent and divergent validity was determined through intercorrelations with the depression and anxiety subscales of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D and HADS-A).
Fit statistics were below critical values (< 1.3). There were no signs of DIF. The PCFAR revealed that the Rasch dimension "depression" explained 68.5% (DESC-I) and 69.3% (DESC-II) of the variance, respectively which suggests unidimensionality and local independence of the DESC. Correlations with HADS-D were rDESC-I = .61 and rDESC-II = .60, whereas correlations with HADS-A were rDESC-I = .62 and rDESC-II = .60.
This study provided further support for the psychometric quality of the DESC. Both forms of the DESC adhered to Rasch model assumptions and showed intercorrelations with HADS subscales that are in line with the literature. The presented normative data offer important advancements for the interpretation of the questionnaire scores and enhance its usefulness for clinical and research applications.
本研究旨在为“基于 Rasch 的抑郁筛查(DESC)”的两种平行形式提供规范数据,基于德国普通人群的代表性样本,检验其 Rasch 模型拟合度以及聚合和发散效度。
本研究样本由一家人口统计咨询公司协助采用面对面访谈方式选取(N = 2509;平均年龄 = 49.4,标准差 = 18.2;55.8%为女性)。采用 Rasch 模型拟合分析(infit 和 outfit)、单维性、局部独立性(残差的主成分因子分析,PCFAR)和与参与者年龄和性别有关的项目区分度(DIF)来确定 Rasch 模型假设的符合程度。计算规范值。通过与医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS-D 和 HADS-A)的抑郁和焦虑分量表的相关性来确定聚合和发散效度。
拟合统计量低于临界值(< 1.3)。没有 DIF 的迹象。PCFAR 表明,Rasch 维度“抑郁”分别解释了 DESC-I(68.5%)和 DESC-II(69.3%)的方差,这表明 DESC 的单维性和局部独立性。与 HADS-D 的相关性分别为 rDESC-I =.61 和 rDESC-II =.60,而与 HADS-A 的相关性分别为 rDESC-I =.62 和 rDESC-II =.60。
本研究进一步支持了 DESC 的心理测量质量。DESC 的两种形式均符合 Rasch 模型假设,并与文献中 HADS 分量表的相关性一致。所提供的规范数据为解释问卷分数提供了重要进展,并增强了其在临床和研究应用中的有用性。