New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers-US Oncology Research Network, Denver, CO.
J Oncol Pract. 2007 Jul;3(4):182-6. doi: 10.1200/JOP.0742001.
To investigate whether recurrence score (RS) as determined using a commercial reference laboratory test influences clinicians' treatment recommendations and eventual treatment in patients with early-stage breast cancer.
A retrospective analysis was performed on 74 patients from a community-based oncology practice with estrogen receptor (ER) -positive, lymph node (LN) -negative stage I or II breast cancer for which RS was obtained. Demographic and pathology information was extracted from medical records. Ten-year relapse-free survival was calculated using Adjuvant! Online. Treatment recommendations before the RS knowledge were compared with treatment recommendations after RS knowledge and to the treatment eventually administered.
A weak correlation was found between RS and both patient age and tumor size, modest correlation between RS and tumor grade, and modest correlation between RS and 10-year recurrence as determined by Adjuvant! Online. For 21% and 25% of patients, knowledge of the RS changed the clinicians' treatment recommendations and eventual treatment, respectively. The decision to change from hormone therapy to chemotherapy (with or without hormone therapy) was generally associated with high RS (high distant recurrence risk as determined by the commercial reference laboratory test), whereas the decision to change from chemotherapy to hormone therapy was generally associated with low RS (low distant recurrence risk as determined by the commercial reference laboratory test). Knowledge of the RS changed treatment recommendations and eventual treatment in patients with ER-positive/LN-negative early-stage breast cancer. Use of genomic-based prognosis may result in more accurate estimates of true recurrence risk than currently possible with commonly used prognostic factors (such as patient age, tumor size, and tumor grade) alone and thus lead to an increase in appropriate adjuvant therapy decision making.
研究使用商业参考实验室测试确定的复发评分(RS)是否会影响临床医生对早期乳腺癌患者的治疗建议和最终治疗。
对来自社区肿瘤实践的 74 名雌激素受体(ER)阳性、淋巴结(LN)阴性 I 期或 II 期乳腺癌患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者获得了 RS。从病历中提取人口统计学和病理学信息。使用 Adjuvant! Online 计算 10 年无复发生存率。比较 RS 知识前后的治疗建议与最终给予的治疗建议。
RS 与患者年龄和肿瘤大小呈弱相关,与肿瘤分级呈中度相关,与 Adjuvant! Online 确定的 10 年复发率呈中度相关。对于 21%和 25%的患者,RS 知识改变了临床医生的治疗建议和最终治疗。从激素治疗改为化疗(联合或不联合激素治疗)的决定通常与 RS 较高(商业参考实验室测试确定的远处复发风险较高)相关,而从化疗改为激素治疗的决定通常与 RS 较低(商业参考实验室测试确定的远处复发风险较低)相关。RS 知识改变了 ER 阳性/LN 阴性早期乳腺癌患者的治疗建议和最终治疗。使用基于基因组的预后可能会比目前仅使用常用预后因素(如患者年龄、肿瘤大小和肿瘤分级)更准确地估计真实的复发风险,从而增加适当的辅助治疗决策。