Beuth Josef
Institute for Naturopathy, University of Cologne, Germany.
Breast Care (Basel). 2009;4(1):8-12. doi: 10.1159/000194306. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
Complementary medicine is currently widely debated by the oncologic community, because the required scientific proof of safety and effectiveness for most of the therapeutic approaches ha s not yet been met with definite results. In the past years, basic research and clinical evaluation of defined complementary therapeutic concepts in oncology have been intensified in an attempt to integrate these procedures into evidence-based medicine. According to definition, scientifically-based therapies of complementary medicine cannot replace the well-studied conventional cancer-destructive therapies such as surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or hormone therapy. Complementary approaches in oncology that are recommended as an addition to standard cancer-destructive therapies claim to optimize this therapy. A great body of data emerging from scientifically sound clinical trials prove that defined complementary procedures are beneficial for the patients.
目前,肿瘤学界对辅助医学进行了广泛的讨论,因为大多数治疗方法所需的安全性和有效性的科学证据尚未得到明确结果。在过去几年中,肿瘤学中特定辅助治疗概念的基础研究和临床评估得到了加强,试图将这些方法纳入循证医学。根据定义,基于科学的辅助医学疗法不能取代诸如手术、化疗、放疗或激素疗法等经过充分研究的传统癌症破坏性疗法。肿瘤学中推荐作为标准癌症破坏性疗法补充的辅助方法声称可优化这种疗法。大量来自科学合理的临床试验的数据证明,特定的辅助程序对患者有益。