School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77225, USA.
Epilepsy Behav. 2010 Nov;19(3):232-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.08.020. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
We compared the scores on self-management and associated psychosocial scales of patients with epilepsy at two clinics in Houston, TX, USA, to determine if there were systematic differences associated with socioeconomic status (SES). Patients of low SES reported higher scores on overall, information, and safety management (P<0.03) and no differences on medication, seizure, and lifestyle management. The two groups were similar with respect to the pattern of high and low scores. Reported levels of self-efficacy, depression, social support, stigma, desire for control, and outcome expectations were higher for those of high SES (P<0.01). Knowledge of epilepsy and satisfaction with care were lower (P<0.01). Again, the patterns of high and low scores were similar. Tests of association between psychosocial factors and self-management revealed that people with higher levels of self-efficacy and social support also reported higher self-management (P<0.01) regardless of demographics, seizure frequency, and SES (P<0.05). These findings provide little support for SES-related disparities in self-management and suggest that the focus of strategies to improve self-management may be similar across diverse populations.
我们比较了美国德克萨斯州休斯顿的两家诊所中癫痫患者的自我管理及其相关心理社会量表评分,以确定社会经济地位(SES)是否与系统性差异有关。社会经济地位较低的患者在总体、信息和安全管理方面的评分更高(P<0.03),而在药物、发作和生活方式管理方面没有差异。两组在高分和低分的分布模式上相似。高 SES 组报告的自我效能感、抑郁、社会支持、耻辱感、控制欲和结果期望水平更高(P<0.01)。对癫痫的了解和对护理的满意度较低(P<0.01)。同样,高分和低分的分布模式相似。社会心理因素与自我管理之间的关联检验表明,无论人口统计学、发作频率和 SES 如何(P<0.05),自我效能感和社会支持水平较高的人也报告了更高的自我管理(P<0.01)。这些发现几乎没有为与 SES 相关的自我管理差异提供支持,并表明,改善自我管理的策略重点可能在不同人群中相似。