Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York 10021, USA.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 Nov;31(10):1853-60. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2246. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
In recent years, the role of CTA and CTP for vasospasm diagnosis in the setting of ASAH has been the subject of many research studies. The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of CTA and CTP for vasospasm in patients with ASAH by using DSA as the criterion standard.
The search strategy for research studies was based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews, including literature data bases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Web of Science) and reference lists of manuscripts published from January 1996 to February 2009. The inclusion criteria were the following: 1) published manuscripts, 2) original research studies with prospective or retrospective data, 3) patients with ASAH, 4) CTA or CTP as the index test, and 5) DSA as the reference standard. Three reviewers independently assessed the quality of these research studies by using the QUADAS tool. Pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR-, DOR, and the SROC curve were determined.
CTA and CTP searches yielded 505 and 214 manuscripts, respectively. Ten research studies met inclusion criteria for each CTA and CTP search. Six CTA and 3 CTP studies had sufficient data for statistical analysis. CTA pooled estimates had 79.6% sensitivity (95%CI, 74.9%-83.8%), 93.1%specificity (95%CI, 91.7%-94.3%), 18.1 LR+ (95%CI, 7.3-45.0), and 0.2 LR- (95%CI, 0.1-0.4); and CTP pooled estimates had 74.1% sensitivity (95%CI, 58.7%- 86.2%), 93.0% specificity (95% CI, 79.6%-98.7%), 9.3 LR+ (95%CI, 3.4-25.9), and 0.2 LR- (95%CI, 0.04-1.2). Overall DORs were 124.5 (95%CI, 28.4-546.4) for CTA and 43.0 (95%CI, 6.5-287.1) for CTP. Area under the SROC curve was 98 ± 2.0%for CTA and 97 ± 3.0% for CTP.
The high diagnostic accuracy determined for both CTA and CTP in this meta-analysis suggests that they are potentially valuable techniques for vasospasm diagnosis in ASAH. Awareness of these results may impact patient care by providing supportive evidence for more effective use of CTA and CTP imaging in ASAH.
近年来,CTA 和 CTP 在蛛网膜下腔出血(ASAH)后血管痉挛诊断中的作用已成为许多研究的主题。本研究旨在通过以数字减影血管造影(DSA)为标准,对 CTA 和 CTP 在诊断 ASAH 后血管痉挛中的诊断性能进行荟萃分析。
研究的检索策略基于 Cochrane 系统评价手册,包括文献数据库(PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 系统评价数据库和 Web of Science)和从 1996 年 1 月至 2009 年 2 月发表的手稿的参考文献列表。纳入标准为:1)已发表的文献,2)具有前瞻性或回顾性数据的原始研究,3)ASAH 患者,4)CTA 或 CTP 作为指标试验,5)DSA 作为参考标准。三名审查员使用 QUADAS 工具独立评估这些研究的质量。确定了敏感性、特异性、LR+、LR-、DOR 和 SROC 曲线的汇总估计值。
CTA 和 CTP 检索分别产生了 505 篇和 214 篇文献。每一项 CTA 和 CTP 检索都有 10 项研究符合纳入标准。有 6 项 CTA 和 3 项 CTP 研究有足够的数据进行统计分析。CTA 汇总估计值的敏感性为 79.6%(95%CI,74.9%-83.8%),特异性为 93.1%(95%CI,91.7%-94.3%),18.1 LR+(95%CI,7.3-45.0)和 0.2 LR-(95%CI,0.1-0.4);CTP 汇总估计值的敏感性为 74.1%(95%CI,58.7%-86.2%),特异性为 93.0%(95%CI,79.6%-98.7%),9.3 LR+(95%CI,3.4-25.9)和 0.2 LR-(95%CI,0.04-1.2)。CTA 的总体 DOR 为 124.5(95%CI,28.4-546.4),CTP 的为 43.0(95%CI,6.5-287.1)。SROC 曲线下面积为 CTA 为 98±2.0%,CTP 为 97±3.0%。
本荟萃分析确定 CTA 和 CTP 具有较高的诊断准确性,这表明它们是 ASAH 后血管痉挛诊断有价值的技术。对这些结果的认识可能会通过为 CTA 和 CTP 成像在 ASAH 中的更有效使用提供支持证据,从而影响患者的护理。