Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jan;9(1):42-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.09.013. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Colonoscopy may have a greater protective effect for distal colorectal cancer (CRC) than proximal CRC. Serrated polyps are frequently located in the proximal colon, can be missed during colonoscopy, and may progress to CRC. We investigated the prevalence and endoscopist detection rates of proximal serrated polyps in a large cohort of average risk patients undergoing screening colonoscopy.
Screening colonoscopies performed by 15 attending gastroenterologists at 2 academic endoscopy units between 2000 and 2009 were reviewed. Serrated polyps included hyperplastic polyps, sessile serrated adenomas, and traditional serrated adenomas. Endoscopist-level detection rates for adenomas and serrated polyps were calculated. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate the associations of adenoma and proximal serrated polyp detection rates. Logistic regression was used to compare endoscopists' detection rates.
A total of 11,049 polyps were detected in 6681 colonoscopies (adenomas: 5637, 51%; serrated: 3984, 36%; proximal serrated: 1238, 11%). The proportion of colonoscopies with at least one proximal serrated polyp was 13% (range 1%-18%). Proximal serrated polyp detection rates per colonoscopy ranged from 0.01 to 0.26. Adenoma and proximal serrated polyp detection rates per colonoscopy were strongly correlated (R = 0.76, P = .0005). The odds of detecting at least one proximal serrated polyp for individual endoscopists ranged from 0.05 to 0.67 compared to the highest level detector. Endoscopist (P < .0001), but not patient age (P = .76) or gender (P = .95), was associated with proximal serrated polyp detection.
In an average-risk screening cohort, the detection of proximal serrated polyps was highly variable and endoscopist dependent. A significant proportion of proximal serrated polyps may be missed during colonoscopy. High-quality colonoscopy is important for the detection and resection of all polyps with neoplastic potential.
结肠镜检查对远端结直肠癌(CRC)的保护作用可能大于近端 CRC。锯齿状息肉通常位于近端结肠,在结肠镜检查中可能会被遗漏,并可能进展为 CRC。我们调查了在一个接受筛查性结肠镜检查的大的平均风险患者队列中,近端锯齿状息肉的患病率和内镜医生检出率。
对 2000 年至 2009 年间在 2 个学术内镜中心由 15 名主治胃肠病学家进行的筛查性结肠镜检查进行了回顾性研究。锯齿状息肉包括增生性息肉、无蒂锯齿状腺瘤和传统锯齿状腺瘤。计算了腺瘤和锯齿状息肉的内镜医生检出率。计算 Pearson 相关系数来评估腺瘤和近端锯齿状息肉检出率的相关性。使用 logistic 回归比较内镜医生的检出率。
在 6681 例结肠镜检查中检出了 11049 个息肉(腺瘤:5637 个,51%;锯齿状:3984 个,36%;近端锯齿状:1238 个,11%)。至少有 1 个近端锯齿状息肉的结肠镜检查比例为 13%(范围为 1%-18%)。每例结肠镜检查检出近端锯齿状息肉的比例为 0.01-0.26。腺瘤和近端锯齿状息肉的检出率与结肠镜检查密切相关(R = 0.76,P =.0005)。与检出率最高的内镜医生相比,个别内镜医生检出至少 1 个近端锯齿状息肉的几率在 0.05 至 0.67 之间。内镜医生(P <.0001),而不是患者年龄(P =.76)或性别(P =.95)与近端锯齿状息肉的检出相关。
在一个平均风险的筛查队列中,近端锯齿状息肉的检出率差异很大,并且依赖于内镜医生。在结肠镜检查中,可能会遗漏大量的近端锯齿状息肉。高质量的结肠镜检查对于发现和切除所有具有潜在肿瘤性的息肉都很重要。