Suppr超能文献

颅脑损伤患者应用低分子肝素进行早期静脉血栓栓塞事件预防:风险与获益。

Early venous thromboembolic event prophylaxis in traumatic brain injury with low-molecular-weight heparin: risks and benefits.

机构信息

Montreal Neurological Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2010 Dec;27(12):2165-72. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1366.

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients are known to be at high risk for venous thromboembolic events (VTEs). The Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines (2007) state that low-molecular-weight heparin or unfractionated heparin should be used to prevent VTE complications, but suggest that there is an increased risk of expansion of intracranial hemorrhages (ICH) with VTE prophylaxis. In addition, it is unclear which treatment regimen (i.e., medication, dose, and timing) provides the best risk:benefit ratio in TBI patients. We reviewed all moderate-to-severe TBI patients admitted over a 5-year period to: (1) examine the occurrence of VTEs and their timing; (2) examine the symptomatic expansion of ICH while on VTE prophylaxis; and (3) compare the efficacy of two prophylactic agents: enoxaparin and dalteparin. Two-hundred eighty-seven patients were included. VTE prophylaxis was started 48-72 h post-trauma in all individuals who had no confounding coagulopathy, when two consecutive computed tomography (CT) scans revealed hemorrhage stability. VTEs occurred in 7.3% of treated patients, mostly within 2 weeks after trauma. Proximal VTEs occurred in 3.1% of treated patients. No significant difference in VTE rates was seen between enoxaparin (7.0%) and dalteparin (7.5%; p = 0.868). Moreover, the group treated with dalteparin was more severely injured (higher Injury Severity Score [p = 0.002]), had lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores (p = 0.003), and had more inferior vena cava (IVC) filters placed (p = 0.007). The two groups did not show significant differences in the development of VTE when controlled for ISS and IVC filters (p = 0.819). Importantly, only one patient suffered a symptomatic expansion of ICH while on VTE prophylaxis, at 15 days post-trauma. These results suggest that current regimens of VTE prophylaxis used in our TBI population provide a relatively high level of protection against VTEs, and an extremely low risk of expanding ICH. They also suggest that there was no difference in VTE between dalteparin- and enoxaparin-treated patients.

摘要

创伤性脑损伤 (TBI) 患者发生静脉血栓栓塞事件 (VTE) 的风险较高。《脑创伤基金会指南》(2007 年)指出,应使用低分子肝素或普通肝素预防 VTE 并发症,但提示 VTE 预防可能会增加颅内出血 (ICH) 扩大的风险。此外,对于 TBI 患者,哪种治疗方案(即药物、剂量和时间)能提供最佳的风险获益比尚不清楚。我们回顾了在过去 5 年中入住的所有中度至重度 TBI 患者:(1)检查 VTE 的发生及其时间;(2)检查 VTE 预防过程中 ICH 的症状性扩大;(3)比较两种预防药物:依诺肝素和达肝素的疗效。共纳入 287 例患者。所有无混杂性凝血障碍的患者,在连续两次 CT 扫描显示出血稳定后,于创伤后 48-72 小时开始 VTE 预防。治疗患者中 VTE 的发生率为 7.3%,大多数发生在创伤后 2 周内。治疗患者中近端 VTE 的发生率为 3.1%。依诺肝素(7.0%)和达肝素(7.5%)之间的 VTE 发生率无显著差异(p=0.868)。此外,接受达肝素治疗的患者损伤更严重(更高的损伤严重程度评分 [p=0.002]),GCS 评分更低(p=0.003),放置下腔静脉滤器更多(p=0.007)。在控制 ISS 和下腔静脉滤器后,两组患者 VTE 的发生无显著差异(p=0.819)。重要的是,只有 1 例患者在 VTE 预防治疗时发生症状性 ICH 扩大,发生在创伤后 15 天。这些结果表明,我们的 TBI 人群中使用的当前 VTE 预防方案提供了相对较高水平的 VTE 保护,且增加 ICH 的风险极低。它们还表明,达肝素和依诺肝素治疗患者之间的 VTE 没有差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验