Suppr超能文献

粗针活检中的单纯平坦上皮不典型增生(DIN 1a):60 例伴后续外科切除的活检研究。

Pure flat epithelial atypia (DIN 1a) on core needle biopsy: study of 60 biopsies with follow-up surgical excision.

机构信息

Eugène Marquis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rennes, France.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Jan;125(1):121-6. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1208-1. Epub 2010 Oct 14.

Abstract

Flat epithelial atypia (FEA) is recognized as a precursor of breast cancer and its management (surgical excision or intensive follow-up) remains unclear after diagnosis on core needle biopsy (CNB). The aim of this study was to determine the underestimation rate of pure FEA on CNB and clinical, radiological, and pathological factors of underestimation. 4,062 CNBs from 5 breast cancer centers, performed over a 5-year period, were evaluated. A CNB diagnosis of pure FEA was made in 60 cases (1.5%) (the presence of atypical ductal hyperplasia, lobular neoplasia, radial scars, phyllodes tumor, papillary lesions, ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive carcinoma at CNB were exclusion criteria), and subsequent surgical excision was systematically performed. The histological diagnosis was retrospectively reviewed using standardized criteria and the precise terminology of the World Health Organization by two pathologist physicians. At surgical excision, 6 (10%) ductal carcinoma in situ and 2 (3%) invasive carcinoma were diagnosed. The total underestimation rate was 13%. FEA was associated with atypical ductal hyperplasia in 10 (17%) cases and with lobular neoplasia in 2 (3%) at final pathology. Residual FEA was found in 14 (23%) cases. No clinical, radiological or pathological factors were significantly associated with underestimation. Our data highlight the importance of recognizing and diagnosing FEA in core needle biopsies. Thus, the presence of FEA on CNB, even in isolation, warrants follow-up excision.

摘要

扁平上皮不典型(FEA)被认为是乳腺癌的前兆,在核心针活检(CNB)诊断后,其处理(手术切除或强化随访)仍不清楚。本研究旨在确定 CNB 中纯 FEA 的低估率以及低估的临床、放射学和病理学因素。对 5 家乳腺癌中心在 5 年内进行的 4062 例 CNB 进行了评估。60 例(1.5%)诊断为纯 FEA(CNB 存在不典型导管增生、小叶肿瘤、放射状瘢痕、叶状肿瘤、乳头状病变、导管原位癌或浸润性癌为排除标准),随后进行了系统的手术切除。使用标准化标准和两位病理医生的世界卫生组织精确术语对组织学诊断进行回顾性复查。在手术切除时,诊断出 6 例(10%)导管原位癌和 2 例(3%)浸润性癌。总的低估率为 13%。FEA 在最终病理中与 10 例(17%)不典型导管增生和 2 例(3%)小叶肿瘤相关。14 例(23%)发现残留 FEA。没有临床、放射学或病理学因素与低估有显著相关性。我们的数据强调了在核心针活检中识别和诊断 FEA 的重要性。因此,即使在孤立的情况下,CNB 上存在 FEA 也需要随访切除。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验