Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology (E040), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Phys Med Biol. 2010 Nov 7;55(21):R193-234. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/21/R01. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
Recently, ion beam radiotherapy (including protons as well as heavier ions) gained considerable interest. Although ion beam radiotherapy requires dose prescription in terms of iso-effective dose (referring to an iso-effective photon dose), absorbed dose is still required as an operative quantity to control beam delivery, to characterize the beam dosimetrically and to verify dose delivery. This paper reviews current methods and standards to determine absorbed dose to water in ion beam radiotherapy, including (i) the detectors used to measure absorbed dose, (ii) dosimetry under reference conditions and (iii) dosimetry under non-reference conditions. Due to the LET dependence of the response of films and solid-state detectors, dosimetric measurements are mostly based on ion chambers. While a primary standard for ion beam radiotherapy still remains to be established, ion chamber dosimetry under reference conditions is based on similar protocols as for photons and electrons although the involved uncertainty is larger than for photon beams. For non-reference conditions, dose measurements in tissue-equivalent materials may also be necessary. Regarding the atomic numbers of the composites of tissue-equivalent phantoms, special requirements have to be fulfilled for ion beams. Methods for calibrating the beam monitor depend on whether passive or active beam delivery techniques are used. QA measurements are comparable to conventional radiotherapy; however, dose verification is usually single field rather than treatment plan based. Dose verification for active beam delivery techniques requires the use of multi-channel dosimetry systems to check the compliance of measured and calculated dose for a representative sample of measurement points. Although methods for ion beam dosimetry have been established, there is still room for developments. This includes improvement of the dosimetric accuracy as well as development of more efficient measurement techniques.
最近,离子束放射治疗(包括质子和重离子)引起了相当大的关注。虽然离子束放射治疗需要以等效剂量(指等效光子剂量)来规定剂量,但吸收剂量仍然是控制束流输送、对束流进行剂量学描述以及验证剂量输送所必需的操作量。本文综述了用于确定离子束放射治疗中水吸收剂量的当前方法和标准,包括(i)用于测量吸收剂量的探测器,(ii)参考条件下的剂量学以及(iii)非参考条件下的剂量学。由于胶片和固态探测器的响应与 LET 有关,剂量学测量主要基于电离室。虽然离子束放射治疗的基准标准仍然有待建立,但参考条件下的电离室剂量学是基于与光子和电子相同的方案进行的,尽管涉及的不确定性比光子束更大。对于非参考条件,可能还需要在组织等效材料中进行剂量测量。关于组织等效体模复合材料的原子数,对离子束有特殊要求。束流监测器的校准方法取决于使用被动还是主动束流输送技术。质量保证测量与常规放射治疗相当;然而,剂量验证通常是单次照射而不是基于治疗计划。主动束流输送技术的剂量验证需要使用多通道剂量测量系统来检查测量和计算剂量在代表性测量点样本上的一致性。尽管已经建立了离子束剂量学方法,但仍有发展空间。这包括提高剂量学准确性以及开发更高效的测量技术。