Research Institute for Health Care Management and Health Economics, Vienna, Austria.
Gerontology. 2011;57(6):481-9. doi: 10.1159/000322089. Epub 2010 Oct 21.
Older patients (≥65 years) are exposed to more harm resulting from adverse events in hospitals than younger patients. Theoretical considerations and empirical findings suggest that safety culture is the key to improving the quality of health care.
To describe the development of a German-language instrument for assessing patient safety culture (PSC) and its reliability and validity; to verify criterion validity by means of a cross-sectional analysis of the impact of PSC on clinical quality that compares acute geriatric units with a sample from intensive care, surgery and trauma surgery departments, and to report variations in the PSC profile between these groups.
Using a review of existing safety culture surveys, multidimensional scaling procedures and expert interviews, we tested the content and convergent validity of a 158-item questionnaire completed by 508 physicians and nurses from 31 acute geriatric units and 7 comparison departments. Criterion validity was verified by various regression models with a self-reported measure of adverse events. Differences in PSC profiles were analyzed using a one-factorial ANOVA and regression models.
We identified 7 constructs of PSC and demonstrated substantial convergent and criterion validity. In the acute geriatric units, higher levels of 'management commitment to patient safety' and lower levels of 'error fatalism' were associated with a reduced incidence of medical errors. In the comparison group, only the variable 'active learning from mistakes' was relevant for safety performance. Our results also indicate that acute geriatric units display higher standards than the comparison group in all the aspects of patient safety examined.
It is possible to measure salient features of PSC using a valid and reliable survey. Some aspects of PSC are more closely related to safety events than others. In acute geriatric units, patient safety appears to be influenced mainly by management's determination of how things are done whereas improvement of the system itself in a more incremental manner is required in the other high-risk ward types.
与年轻患者相比,老年患者(≥65 岁)在医院中因不良事件而遭受的伤害更大。理论考虑和实证研究结果表明,安全文化是提高医疗保健质量的关键。
描述一种用于评估患者安全文化(PSC)的德语工具的开发及其可靠性和有效性;通过对 PSC 对比较急性老年科与重症监护、外科和创伤外科部门的临床质量的影响的横断面分析来验证效标效度,并报告这些组之间 PSC 特征的变化。
使用对现有安全文化调查的回顾、多维尺度程序和专家访谈,我们测试了由 31 个急性老年科病房和 7 个比较科室的 508 名医生和护士完成的包含 158 个项目的问卷的内容和收敛有效性。通过使用自我报告的不良事件措施的各种回归模型来验证效标效度。使用单因素方差分析和回归模型分析 PSC 特征的差异。
我们确定了 7 个 PSC 结构,并证明了具有实质性的收敛和效标有效性。在急性老年科病房中,“管理层对患者安全的承诺”水平较高和“错误宿命论”水平较低与医疗错误发生率降低有关。在比较组中,只有“从错误中主动学习”变量与安全绩效相关。我们的结果还表明,在所有检查的患者安全方面,急性老年科病房的标准均高于比较组。
使用有效且可靠的调查可以衡量 PSC 的显著特征。PSC 的某些方面与安全事件的关系比其他方面更密切。在急性老年科病房中,患者安全主要受到管理层决定如何做事的影响,而在其他高风险病房类型中,则需要以更渐进的方式改进系统本身。