Queen's University Belfast, United Kingdom.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Jan;48(1):62-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.05.011. Epub 2010 Jun 9.
The attitudes members of the nursing profession hold towards survivors of brain injury may impact on the level of help, and degree of involvement they are willing to have. Given that the manner in which an individual receives their brain injury has been shown to impact on public prejudices, the importance of exploring nursing attitudes to this vulnerable group, and the subsequent impact this may have on the caring role, requires investigation.
To investigate the attitudes held by members of the nursing profession towards young male survivors of brain injury whose behaviour either contributed, or did not contribute, to their injury.
Independent groups design.
Ninety trainee and sixty-nine qualified nurses respectively drawn from a university in the south west of England and the emergency, orthopaedic and paediatric Departments of the Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, UK.
Participants were randomly assigned to one of four fictional brain injury scenarios. A young male character was portrayed as sustaining a brain injury as a result of either an aneurysm, or through drug taking, with their behaviour being either a contributory or non-contributory factor. On reading these, participants were asked to complete the prejudicial evaluation scale, the social interaction scale and the helping behaviour scale.
Analysis of variance showed that qualified nurses held more prejudicial attitudes than student nurses towards survivors of brain injury. Mean scores indicated that individuals seen as contributing towards their injury were likely to experience more prejudice (blame total=42.35 vs. no blame total=38.34), less social interaction (blame total=37.54 vs. no blame total=41.10), and less helping behaviour (blame total=21.49 vs. no blame total=22.34) by both groups.
Qualified nurses should be mindful of the impact their attitudes and judgements of survivors of brain injury may have on the subsequent care they provide. Greater emphasis on the effects of negative attitudes on patient interactions during training may provide nurses with the understanding to recognise and avoid challenges to their caring role in the future.
护理专业人员对脑损伤幸存者的态度可能会影响他们提供帮助的程度和参与程度。鉴于个体接受脑损伤的方式已被证明会影响公众的偏见,因此需要探讨护理人员对这一弱势群体的态度,以及这可能对护理角色产生的后续影响。
调查护理专业人员对脑损伤年轻男性幸存者的态度,这些幸存者的行为要么导致了他们的受伤,要么没有。
独立组设计。
分别从英格兰西南部的一所大学和英国皇家德文郡和埃克塞特大医院的急诊、骨科和儿科科室抽取 90 名实习护士和 69 名合格护士。
参与者被随机分配到四个虚构的脑损伤场景之一。一个年轻男性角色被描绘为因动脉瘤或吸毒而导致脑损伤,其行为是导致或非导致脑损伤的因素之一。阅读这些内容后,参与者被要求完成偏见评估量表、社会互动量表和帮助行为量表。
方差分析显示,合格护士对脑损伤幸存者的偏见态度比实习护士更强烈。平均得分表明,被认为对自己的伤害负有责任的人更有可能受到更多的偏见(总责备=42.35 分,无责备=38.34 分)、更少的社会互动(总责备=37.54 分,无责备=41.10 分)和更少的帮助行为(总责备=21.49 分,无责备=22.34 分),这两组都是如此。
合格护士应该意识到他们对脑损伤幸存者的态度和判断可能对他们随后提供的护理产生影响。在培训中更加强调消极态度对患者互动的影响,可能会使护士理解并避免未来对他们护理角色的挑战。