Drug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Department of Pharmacology, Monash University, 399 Royal Parade, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Mol Pharmacol. 2011 Feb;79(2):298-307. doi: 10.1124/mol.110.067454. Epub 2010 Oct 26.
Although G protein-coupled receptors are often categorized in terms of their primary coupling to a given type of Gα protein subunit, it is now well established that many show promiscuous coupling and activate multiple signaling pathways. Furthermore, some agonists selectively activate signaling pathways by promoting interaction between distinct receptor conformational states and particular Gα subunits or alternative signaling proteins. We have tested the capacity of agonists to stimulate Ca(2+) release, cAMP accumulation, and changes in extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) at the human α(1A)-adrenoceptor. Signaling bias factors were determined by novel application of an operational model of agonism and compared with the reference endogenous agonist norepinephrine; values significantly different from 1.0 indicated an agonist that promoted receptor conformations distinct from that favored by norepinephrine. Oxymetazoline was a full agonist for ECAR and a partial agonist for Ca(2+) release (bias factor 8.2) but failed to stimulate cAMP production. Phenylephrine showed substantial bias toward ECAR versus Ca(2+) release or cAMP accumulation (bias factors 21 and 33, respectively) but did not display bias between Ca(2+) and cAMP pathways. Cirazoline and N-[5-(4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-yl)-2-hydroxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydronaphthalen-1-yl]methanesulfonamide (A61603) displayed bias toward cAMP relative to Ca(2+) release (bias factors of 7.4 and 8.6). It is noteworthy that epinephrine, a second endogenous adrenoceptor agonist, did not display bias relative to norepinephrine. Our finding that phenylephrine displayed significant signaling bias, despite being highly similar in structure to epinephrine, indicates that subtle differences in agonist-receptor interaction can affect conformational changes in cytoplasmic domains and thereby modulate the repertoire of effector proteins that are activated.
虽然 G 蛋白偶联受体通常根据其与特定类型 Gα 蛋白亚基的主要偶联来分类,但现在已经明确,许多受体表现出混杂的偶联作用,并激活多种信号通路。此外,一些激动剂通过促进不同受体构象状态与特定 Gα 亚基或替代信号蛋白之间的相互作用,选择性地激活信号通路。我们已经测试了激动剂刺激人 α(1A)-肾上腺素受体释放 Ca(2+)、cAMP 积累和细胞外酸化率 (ECAR)变化的能力。通过激动作用的操作模型的新应用确定了信号转导偏向因子,并与参考内源性激动剂去甲肾上腺素进行了比较;与 1.0 值显著不同的值表明激动剂促进了与去甲肾上腺素偏好的受体构象不同的受体构象。奥昔布宁是 ECAR 的完全激动剂,是 Ca(2+)释放的部分激动剂(偏向因子 8.2),但不能刺激 cAMP 产生。苯肾上腺素对 ECAR 具有显著的偏向性,而对 Ca(2+)释放或 cAMP 积累具有显著的偏向性(偏向因子分别为 21 和 33),但在 Ca(2+)和 cAMP 途径之间没有偏向性。西拉唑啉和 N-[5-(4,5-二氢-1H-咪唑-2-基)-2-羟基-5,6,7,8-四氢萘-1-基]甲磺酰胺(A61603)与 Ca(2+)释放相比,对 cAMP 具有偏向性(偏向因子分别为 7.4 和 8.6)。值得注意的是,内源性肾上腺素受体激动剂肾上腺素相对于去甲肾上腺素没有表现出偏向性。我们发现,尽管苯肾上腺素在结构上与肾上腺素非常相似,但它表现出显著的信号转导偏向性,这表明激动剂-受体相互作用的细微差异可以影响细胞质结构域中的构象变化,从而调节激活的效应蛋白的种类。