Heyman Gail D, Sweet Monica A, Lee Kang
University of California, San Diego.
Soc Dev. 2009 Aug;18(3):728-746. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00495.x.
Children's reasoning about lying and truth-telling was examined among participants ages 7-11 (total N = 181) with reference to conflicts between being honest and protecting the feelings of others. In Study 1, participants showed different patterns of evaluation and motivational inference in politeness contexts vs. transgression contexts: in politeness contexts, they rated lie-telling more favorably and were far more likely to assume that motives were prosocial. In Study 2, participants evaluated lie-telling more positively and truth-telling more negatively in politeness contexts, especially when they focused on the implications of the statements for others instead of whether the statements were true or false.
在181名7至11岁的参与者中,研究了儿童对于说谎和讲真话的推理,研究涉及诚实与保护他人感受之间的冲突。在研究1中,参与者在礼貌情境与违规情境中表现出不同的评价模式和动机推断:在礼貌情境中,他们对说谎的评价更为积极,并且更有可能认为动机是亲社会的。在研究2中,参与者在礼貌情境中对说谎的评价更为积极,而对讲真话的评价更为消极,尤其是当他们关注陈述对他人的影响而不是陈述是否真实时。