Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Jun;43(6):974-81. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31820607a3.
There is evolving evidence that intense exercise may place a disproportionate load on the right ventricle (RV) when compared with the left ventricle (LV) of the heart. Using a novel method of estimating end-systolic wall stress (ES-σ), we compared the RV and LV during exercise and assessed whether this influenced chronic ventricular remodeling in athletes.
For this study, 39 endurance athletes (EA) and 14 nonathletes (NA) underwent resting cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), maximal oxygen uptake (VO2), and exercise echocardiography studies. LV and RV end-systolic wall stress (ES-σ) were calculated using the Laplace relation (ES-σ = Pr/(2h)). Ventricular size and wall thickness were determined by CMR; invasive and Doppler echo estimates were used to measure systemic and pulmonary ventricular pressures, respectively; and stroke volume was quantified by Doppler echocardiography and used to calculate changes in ventricular geometry during exercise.
In EA, compared with NA, resting CMR measures showed greater RV than LV remodeling. The ratios RV ESV/LV ESV (1.40 ± 0.23 vs 1.26 ± 0.12, P = 0.007) and RV mass/LV mass (0.29 ± 0.04 vs 0.25 ± 0.03, P = 0.012) were greater in EA than in NA. RVES-σ was lower at rest than LVES-σ (143 ± 44 vs 252 ± 49 kdyn · cm, P < 0.001) but increased more with strenuous exercise (125% vs 14%, P < 0.001), resulting in similar peak exercise ES-σ (321 ± 106 vs 286 ± 77 kdyn · cm, P = 0.058). Peak exercise RVES-σ was greater in EA than in NA (340 ± 107 vs 266 ± 82 kdyn · cm, P = 0.028), whereas RVES-σ at matched absolute workloads did not differ (P = 0.79).
Exercise induces a relative increase in RVES-σ which exceeds LVES-σ. In athletes, greater RV enlargement and greater wall thickening may be a product of this disproportionate load excess.
有研究证据表明,与左心室(LV)相比,剧烈运动可能会给右心室(RV)带来不成比例的负荷。本研究采用一种新的估计收缩末期壁应力(ES-σ)的方法,比较了运动时 RV 和 LV 的情况,并评估了这是否会影响运动员的慢性心室重构。
本研究纳入 39 名耐力运动员(EA)和 14 名非运动员(NA),进行静息心脏磁共振(CMR)、最大摄氧量(VO2)和运动超声心动图检查。LV 和 RV 收缩末期壁应力(ES-σ)通过 Laplace 关系(ES-σ= Pr/(2h))计算。通过 CMR 确定心室大小和壁厚度;通过侵入性和多普勒超声心动图分别测量系统和肺心室压力;通过多普勒超声心动图测量心搏量,并用于计算运动期间心室几何形状的变化。
与 NA 相比,EA 的静息 CMR 测量显示 RV 比 LV 重塑更大。EA 的 RV 收缩末期容积与 LV 收缩末期容积比值(1.40±0.23 比 1.26±0.12,P=0.007)和 RV 质量与 LV 质量比值(0.29±0.04 比 0.25±0.03,P=0.012)更大。与 NA 相比,RVES-σ 在静息时较低(143±44 比 252±49 kdyn·cm,P<0.001),但在剧烈运动时增加更多(125%比 14%,P<0.001),导致峰值运动 ES-σ 相似(321±106 比 286±77 kdyn·cm,P=0.058)。与 NA 相比,EA 的峰值运动 RVES-σ 更高(340±107 比 266±82 kdyn·cm,P=0.028),而在匹配的绝对工作量下,RVES-σ 没有差异(P=0.79)。
运动引起 RVES-σ 的相对增加,超过 LVES-σ。在运动员中,更大的 RV 扩大和更大的壁增厚可能是这种不成比例负荷过剩的结果。