Malaria Consortium, Development House, London EC2A 4LT, UK.
Malar J. 2010 Nov 18;9:330. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-330.
Long-lasting insecticidal nets are an effective tool for malaria prevention, and "universal coverage" with such nets is increasingly the goal of national malaria control programmes. However, national level campaigns in several countries have run out of nets in the course of distribution, indicating a problem in the method used to estimate the quantity needed.
A major reason for the shortfall in estimation is the mismatch between the quantification factor used to plan procurement and the allocation algorithm used at community level, in particular the effect of needing to add an additional net to households with an odd number of inhabitants. To solve this problem a revised quantification factor is suggested.
Based on data from a broad range of household surveys across Africa, the effect of odd-numbered households on numbers of nets distributed is estimated via two frequently used allocation methods. The impact of these algorithms on the proportion of households reaching a person to net ratio of 2:1, a frequently used marker of universal coverage is then calculated.
In order to avoid stock-outs of nets during national coverage campaigns, it is recommended to use a quantification factor of 1.78 people per net, with an additional allocation factor suggested to account for other common problems at the community level resulting in a final recommended ratio of 1.60 people per net. It is also recommend that community level allocation procedures be aligned with procurement estimates to reduce shortages of nets during campaign distributions. These analyses should enable programme managers to make evidence-based decisions and support a more efficient and effective use of LLIN distribution campaign resources.
长效杀虫蚊帐是预防疟疾的有效工具,越来越多的国家疟疾控制规划以“全民覆盖”长效杀虫蚊帐为目标。然而,一些国家的国家级运动在分发过程中用光了蚊帐,这表明在估计所需数量的方法上存在问题。
估计不足的一个主要原因是用于规划采购的量化因素与社区层面使用的分配算法不匹配,特别是需要为奇数居民的家庭添加额外蚊帐的影响。为了解决这个问题,建议修改量化因素。
基于非洲广泛的家庭调查数据,通过两种常用的分配方法,估计奇数家庭对分发蚊帐数量的影响。然后计算这些算法对达到人均 2:1 蚊帐比例的家庭比例的影响,这是一个常用的普遍覆盖标记。
为了避免在国家覆盖运动期间蚊帐缺货,建议使用每人 1.78 个蚊帐的量化因素,并建议使用额外的分配因素来解决社区层面的其他常见问题,最终建议的比例为每人 1.60 个蚊帐。还建议社区层面的分配程序与采购估计保持一致,以减少运动分发期间蚊帐短缺。这些分析应该使项目管理人员能够做出基于证据的决策,并支持更有效地利用长效驱虫蚊帐分发运动资源。