Cheung K Katherine, Mirzaei Masoud, Leeder Stephen
Faculty of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Aust Health Rev. 2010 Nov;34(4):405-13. doi: 10.1071/AH09767.
Health policy analysis remains surprisingly undeveloped in Australia given the power that policy exercises over the direction of public health. This paper describes the use of a policy analysis tool to evaluate the alignment between policy statements and intended outcomes of principal chronic illness policy documents in New South Wales (NSW) from 1999 to 2008. In doing so, it demonstrates the utility of a set of predefined criteria for use in retrospective policy analysis and potential for use in reviewing policy proposals and making future health policies.
We analysed the major health policy for the care of people with chronic disease in NSW, the Chronic Care Program, using a modified set of existing criteria derived from the logic of events theoretical framework, which conceptualises the connection between policy determinants and outcomes. A document map was also developed to identify linkages between the policy documents analysed.
Internal validity, the alignment between policy statements and intended outcomes, was highest for policy background and goal-setting criteria, and lowest for accessibility, resources, public opportunities and monitoring and evaluation criteria. The use of document mapping was vital in determining linkages between the closely related policy documents of this complex initiative.
The use of predefined criteria to identify in policy documents where policy statements are not consistent with intended outcomes, in conjunction with policy mapping, are useful methods of analysing complex policy initiatives. In the Australian context, the use of a validated policy-analysis tool might help achieve greater consistency.
The use of a tool during policy development to identify in policy documents where statements are not consistent with intended outcomes may increase the likelihood of the successful implementation of future health policy. The tool can also assist those who make and review future policies.
鉴于政策对公共卫生方向具有影响力,澳大利亚的卫生政策分析仍出人意料地不够完善。本文描述了运用一种政策分析工具来评估新南威尔士州(NSW)1999年至2008年主要慢性病政策文件的政策声明与预期结果之间的一致性。在此过程中,展示了一套预定义标准在回顾性政策分析中的效用以及用于审查政策提案和制定未来卫生政策的潜力。
我们使用从事件逻辑理论框架衍生而来的一组经过修改的现有标准,对新南威尔士州针对慢性病患者的主要卫生政策即慢性病护理计划进行了分析,该理论框架将政策决定因素与结果之间的联系概念化。还绘制了一份文件地图,以确定所分析政策文件之间的联系。
内部有效性,即政策声明与预期结果之间的一致性,在政策背景和目标设定标准方面最高,在可及性、资源、公共机会以及监测与评估标准方面最低。文件映射的运用对于确定这一复杂倡议中密切相关的政策文件之间的联系至关重要。
使用预定义标准来识别政策文件中政策声明与预期结果不一致的地方,再结合政策映射,是分析复杂政策倡议的有用方法。在澳大利亚的背景下,使用经过验证的政策分析工具可能有助于实现更高的一致性。
在政策制定过程中使用一种工具来识别政策文件中声明与预期结果不一致的地方,可能会增加未来卫生政策成功实施的可能性。该工具还可以协助制定和审查未来政策的人员。