Suppr超能文献

中文版 Oswestry 残疾指数在慢性下腰痛患者中的反应性。

Responsiveness of the Chinese version of the Oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain.

机构信息

Pain Treatment Centre of Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 107 Yanjiang West Road, 510120 Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2011 Mar;20(3):475-81. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1624-2. Epub 2010 Nov 26.

Abstract

The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the most widely used questionnaires that assess disability in patients with low back pain (LBP). Responsiveness is both an important psychometric property of an instrument and a key issue for clinicians when choosing suitable outcome measures. The objective of this study was to examine the responsiveness of the Chinese version of the ODI (ODI-Chinese) for subjects with chronic LBP following a physical therapy program. In total, 76 patients with chronic LBP completed the ODI-Chinese, a visual analog scale (VAS) of pain, and the Chinese version of Short Form-36 (SF-36) before and after treatment. All patients also completed a global perception of change Likert scale in condition after the program. The scale was collapsed to produce a dichotomous variable outcome, improved or non-improved. The responsiveness of the instruments was determined using the standardized response means (SRM) and receiver operating characteristics (ROC). After treatment, 56 patients considered themselves to be improved. The SRM of the ODI-Chinese was -1.2 in the improved group and -0.4 in the non-improved group. The area of the ROC curve for the ODI-Chinese was 0.77 (95% CI 0.66-0.89). Therefore, the Chinese version of the ODI is both responsive and appropriate for use in chronic LBP patients after conservative therapy.

摘要

Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)是评估腰痛(LBP)患者残疾程度最广泛使用的问卷之一。反应度既是仪器的重要心理计量学特性,也是临床医生选择合适的结果测量方法时的关键问题。本研究的目的是检验物理治疗方案后慢性 LBP 患者 ODI 中文版(ODI-Chinese)的反应度。共有 76 名慢性 LBP 患者在治疗前后完成了 ODI-Chinese、疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)和中文版 Short Form-36(SF-36)。所有患者在治疗后还完成了对自身状况的整体变化 Likert 量表评估。该量表被简化为二分类变量,即改善或未改善。使用标准化反应均值(SRM)和受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)来确定仪器的反应度。治疗后,56 名患者认为自己有所改善。改善组的 ODI-Chinese 的 SRM 为-1.2,未改善组为-0.4。ODI-Chinese 的 ROC 曲线面积为 0.77(95%CI 0.66-0.89)。因此,ODI 中文版在慢性 LBP 患者接受保守治疗后是敏感且适用的。

相似文献

1
Responsiveness of the Chinese version of the Oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain.
Eur Spine J. 2011 Mar;20(3):475-81. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1624-2. Epub 2010 Nov 26.
3
Responsiveness of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Oswestry Disability Index in subjects with low back pain.
Eur Spine J. 2008 Aug;17(8):1101-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0690-1. Epub 2008 May 30.
7
Reliability and validity study of the Gujarati version of the Oswestry Disability Index 2.1a.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017 Sep 22;30(5):1103-1109. doi: 10.3233/BMR-169728.

引用本文的文献

2
Traditional Chinese medicine manual therapy for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case report.
Front Pediatr. 2025 Jan 21;12:1500373. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1500373. eCollection 2024.
5
Factors affecting functional disability in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study.
Front Neurol. 2024 May 1;15:1367400. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1367400. eCollection 2024.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometric properties and clinical usefulness of the Oswestry Disability Index.
J Chiropr Med. 2008 Dec;7(4):161-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2008.07.001.
2
Validation of the simplified Chinese version of the Oswestry Disability Index.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 May 15;34(11):1211-6; discussion 1217. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819e2b34.
4
Responsiveness of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Oswestry Disability Index in subjects with low back pain.
Eur Spine J. 2008 Aug;17(8):1101-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0690-1. Epub 2008 May 30.
6
Self-report outcome measures for low back pain: searching for international cross-cultural adaptations.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Apr 20;32(9):1028-37. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000261024.27926.0f.
8
Discriminative validity and responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index among Japanese outpatients with lumbar conditions.
Eur Spine J. 2006 Nov;15(11):1645-50. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0022-7. Epub 2006 Feb 14.
9
Prediction of costs-of-illness in patients with low back pain undergoing orthopedic outpatient rehabilitation.
Int J Rehabil Res. 2005 Jun;28(2):119-26. doi: 10.1097/00004356-200506000-00004.
10
Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 2: sensitivity to change after spinal surgery.
Eur Spine J. 2006 Jan;15(1):66-73. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0816-z. Epub 2005 Apr 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验