Department of Physical Rehabilitation and Medicine, Ufuk University, Ankara, Turkey.
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2010;65(10):1019-22. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322010001000016.
Conflicting results were reported about the effectiveness of Low level laser therapy on musculoskeletal disorders. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of 850-nm gallium arsenide aluminum (Ga-As-Al) laser therapy on pain, range of motion and disability in subacromial impingement syndrome.
A total of 52 patients (33 females and 19 males with a mean age of 53.59 ± 11.34 years) with subacromial impingement syndrome were included. The patients were randomly assigned into two groups. Group I (n = 30, laser group) received laser therapy (5 joule/cm² at each point over maximum 5-6 painful points for 1 minute). Group II (n = 22, placebo laser group) received placebo laser therapy. Initially cold pack (10 minutes) was applied to all of the patients. Also patients were given an exercise program including range of motion, stretching and progressive resistive exercises. The therapy program was applied 5 times a week for 14 sessions. Pain severity was assessed by using visual analogue scale. Range of motion was measured by goniometer. Disability was evaluated by using Shoulder Pain and Disability Index.
In group I, statistically significant improvements in pain severity, range of motion except internal and external rotation and SPADI scores were observed compared to baseline scores after the therapy (p < 0.05). In Group II, all parameters except range of motion of external rotation were improved (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were recorded between the groups (p > 0.05).
The Low level laser therapy seems to have no superiority over placebo laser therapy in reducing pain severity, range of motion and functional disability.
低水平激光疗法对肌肉骨骼疾病的疗效存在争议。本研究旨在探讨 850nm 砷化镓铝(Ga-As-Al)激光治疗对肩峰下撞击综合征疼痛、活动范围和功能障碍的疗效。
共纳入 52 例(33 名女性和 19 名男性,平均年龄 53.59±11.34 岁)肩峰下撞击综合征患者。患者随机分为两组。组 I(n=30,激光组)接受激光治疗(每个最大 5-6 个痛点 5 焦耳/cm²,每个痛点 1 分钟)。组 II(n=22,安慰剂激光组)接受安慰剂激光治疗。所有患者最初均接受冷疗(10 分钟)。还为患者提供了一项包括活动范围、伸展和渐进性抗阻运动的锻炼计划。治疗方案每周进行 5 次,共进行 14 次。疼痛严重程度采用视觉模拟评分法评估。活动范围通过量角器测量。采用肩痛和残疾指数评估残疾程度。
治疗后,组 I 的疼痛严重程度、除内旋和外旋外的活动范围和 SPADI 评分均显著改善,与基线评分相比(p<0.05)。组 II 中,除外旋活动范围外,所有参数均得到改善(p<0.05)。然而,两组之间无显著差异(p>0.05)。
低水平激光疗法在减轻疼痛严重程度、活动范围和功能障碍方面似乎没有优于安慰剂激光疗法。