Suppr超能文献

降压药物与癌症风险:来自随机试验的 324168 名参与者的网络荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。

Antihypertensive drugs and risk of cancer: network meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of 324,168 participants from randomised trials.

机构信息

New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jan;12(1):65-82. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70260-6. Epub 2010 Nov 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The risk of cancer from antihypertensive drugs has been much debated, with a recent analysis showing increased risk with angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs). We assessed the association between antihypertensive drugs and cancer risk in a comprehensive analysis of data from randomised clinical trials.

METHODS

We undertook traditional direct comparison meta-analyses, multiple comparisons (network) meta-analyses, and trial sequential analyses. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1950, to August, 2010, for randomised clinical trials of antihypertensive therapy (ARBs, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors [ACEi], β blockers, calcium-channel blockers [CCBs], or diuretics) with follow-up of at least 1 year. Our primary outcomes were cancer and cancer-related deaths.

FINDINGS

We identified 70 randomised controlled trials (148 comparator groups) with 324,168 participants. In the network meta-analysis (fixed-effect model), we recorded no difference in the risk of cancer with ARBs (proportion with cancer 2·04%; odds ratio 1·01, 95% CI 0·93-1·09), ACEi (2·03%; 1·00, 0·92-1·09), β blockers (1·97%; 0·97, 0·88-1·07), CCBs (2·11%; 1·05, 0·96-1·13), diuretics (2·02%; 1·00, 0·90-1·11), or other controls (1·95%, 0·97, 0·74-1·24) versus placebo (2·02%). There was an increased risk with the combination of ACEi plus ARBs (2·30%, 1·14, 1·02-1·28); however, this risk was not apparent in the random-effects model (odds ratio 1·15, 95% CI 0·92-1·38). No differences were detected in cancer-related mortality for ARBs (death rate 1·33%; odds ratio 1·00, 95% CI 0·87-1·15), ACEi (1·25%; 0·95, 0·81-1·10), β blockers (1·23%; 0·93, 0·80-1·08), CCBs (1·27%; 0·96, 0·82-1·11), diuretics (1·30%; 0·98, 0·84-1·13), other controls (1·43%; 1·08, 0·78-1·46), and ACEi plus ARBs (1·45%; 1·10, 0·90-1·32). In direct comparison meta-analyses, similar results were recorded for all antihypertensive classes, except for an increased risk of cancer with ACEi and ARB combination (OR 1·14, 95% CI 1·04-1·24; p=0·004) and with CCBs (1·06, 1·01-1·12; p=0·02). However, we noted no significant differences in cancer-related mortality. On the basis of trial sequential analysis, our results suggest no evidence of even a 5-10% relative risk (RR) increase of cancer and cancer-related deaths with any individual class of antihypertensive drugs studied. However, for the ACEi and ARB combination, the cumulative Z curve crossed the trial sequential monitoring boundary, suggesting firm evidence for at least a 10% RR increase in cancer risk.

INTERPRETATION

Our analysis refutes a 5·0-10·0% relative increase in the risk of cancer or cancer-related death with the use of ARBs, ACEi, β blockers, diuretics, and CCBs. However, increased risk of cancer with the combination of ACEi and ARBs cannot be ruled out.

摘要

背景

降压药物致癌的风险一直备受争议,最近的一项分析显示血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)会增加风险。我们对来自随机临床试验的数据进行了综合分析,评估了降压药物与癌症风险之间的关系。

方法

我们进行了传统的直接比较荟萃分析、多项比较(网络)荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。我们从 1950 年到 2010 年 8 月在 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库中搜索了随机降压治疗试验(ARB、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂[ACEi]、β受体阻滞剂、钙通道阻滞剂[CCB]或利尿剂)的随访时间至少 1 年的研究。我们的主要结局是癌症和癌症相关死亡。

结果

我们确定了 70 项随机对照试验(148 个比较组),共有 324168 名参与者。在网络荟萃分析(固定效应模型)中,我们没有发现 ARB(癌症发生率 2.04%;比值比 1.01,95%置信区间 0.93-1.09)、ACEi(2.03%;1.00,0.92-1.09)、β受体阻滞剂(1.97%;0.97,0.88-1.07)、CCB(2.11%;1.05,0.96-1.13)、利尿剂(2.02%;1.00,0.90-1.11)或其他对照药物(1.95%;0.97,0.74-1.24)与安慰剂(2.02%)相比,癌症风险存在差异。ACEi 和 ARB 联合使用的风险增加(2.30%;1.14,1.02-1.28);然而,在随机效应模型中,这一风险并不明显(比值比 1.15,95%置信区间 0.92-1.38)。ARB(死亡率 1.33%;比值比 1.00,95%置信区间 0.87-1.15)、ACEi(1.25%;0.95,0.81-1.10)、β受体阻滞剂(1.23%;0.93,0.80-1.08)、CCB(1.27%;0.96,0.82-1.11)、利尿剂(1.30%;0.98,0.84-1.13)和 ACEi 和 ARB 联合使用(1.45%;1.10,0.90-1.32)的癌症相关死亡率没有差异。在直接比较荟萃分析中,除了 ACEi 和 ARB 联合使用(比值比 1.14,95%置信区间 1.04-1.24;p=0.004)和 CCB(比值比 1.06,1.01-1.12;p=0.02)外,所有降压药物类别均记录到相似的结果。然而,我们没有发现癌症相关死亡率的显著差异。基于试验序贯分析,我们的结果表明,没有证据表明任何一种研究的降压药物类别会导致癌症或癌症相关死亡的相对风险增加 5-10%。然而,对于 ACEi 和 ARB 联合使用,累积 Z 曲线穿过了试验序贯监测边界,表明癌症风险增加至少 10%的 RR 具有确凿证据。

解释

我们的分析驳斥了使用 ARB、ACEi、β受体阻滞剂、利尿剂和 CCB 会导致癌症或癌症相关死亡的相对风险增加 5.0-10.0%的说法。然而,不能排除 ACEi 和 ARB 联合使用会增加癌症风险的可能性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验