Centre for Research on Social Inclusion, Macquarie University.
Br J Sociol. 2010 Dec;61(4):677-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01336.x.
Following conservative politicians, neoliberal philosophers and radical critics, different strands of social science, including those using Foucault's governmentality approach, joined the questioning of the salience of 'society' and ideas of 'the social' over the last decades. When the social reappeared, it was often in the moral domains of community and civil society. This argument re-evaluates the contribution of Foucauldian histories, or 'genealogies', of the social to these fundamental questions. Drawing upon them, it attends to their arguments concerning the place of social thought on the modern episteme in relation to economics, the emergence of the idea of 'society' with the modern arts of government of the state, and the formation of the 'social question'. The argument here allows that preconditions of formation of 'society' lie in the legal and political techniques of the territorial sovereign state. However, the literature under investigation indicates the implicit normativity of an idea of 'society' as a 'problematic unity' and the enduring necessity of a social domain in a law-governed state with a relatively independent economic sphere. This discussion thus seeks to contribute to the wider revaluation and redeployment of these terms in today's context.
在过去几十年中,继保守派政治家、新自由主义哲学家和激进批评家之后,包括使用福柯的治理术方法在内的不同社会科学流派也开始质疑“社会”的重要性和“社会”观念。当“社会”再次出现时,它往往出现在社区和公民社会的道德领域。本文重新评估了福柯式的社会历史或“谱系”对这些基本问题的贡献。通过借鉴这些历史或“谱系”,本文关注它们关于社会思想在现代知识论中与经济学的关系、随着国家现代治理技艺的出现而出现的“社会”观念,以及“社会问题”的形成。此处的观点认为,“社会”形成的前提条件在于领土主权国家的法律和政治技术。然而,所调查的文献表明,作为一个“有问题的统一体”的“社会”观念隐含着规范性,而且在一个具有相对独立经济领域的法治国家中,社会领域具有持久的必要性。因此,本文试图为在当今背景下更广泛地重新评价和重新部署这些术语做出贡献。