Radiology Department, Medical University of Lodz, Poland, 90-153, Lodz Kopcinskiego 22.
Neuroradiology. 2011 Jul;53(7):523-31. doi: 10.1007/s00234-010-0809-z. Epub 2010 Dec 17.
The aim of our study was to determine the possibility of using a new functional technique: a T1-dependent sequence with administration of blood pool contrast agent (BPCA), in patients with brain tumors before and after surgical treatment. We also aimed to compare our results with those obtained using the fMRI technique, based on Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent (BOLD) contrast.
For each of our 14 oncologic patients (four before and ten after neurosurgical intervention), we obtained: a T1-3D GRE sequence (TR = 2.6 ms/TE = 1.1 ms/FA = 10°) after intravenous administration of BPCA (0.03 mmol/kg), as well as a T2*EPI sequence (TR = 3 s/TE = 50 ms/FA = 90°). Movement and/or tactile block type paradigms were carried out during both functional runs. SPM5 software was used for analysis.
For both functional techniques, maximum activations were localized in the same areas. There were no significant differences observed in the t values calculated for activations located in the primary motor cortex between groups of pre- and post-intervention patients (in the same functional technique). The mean values for T2* EPI examinations were 10.84 and 9.36, respectively. The mean t values for the T1 technique were lower, especially for the post-intervention patients (5.83 and 3.9, respectively).
The T1 technique can be used to detect functional areas in patients with brain tumors, pre-, and post-surgical intervention. This technique enables the evaluation of cortical centers that suffer from susceptibility artifacts when using the T2* BOLD technique. Activations found using both techniques have the same localization, with lower values for the T1 technique.
我们研究的目的是确定一种新的功能技术的可能性:一种 T1 依赖性序列,联合血池对比剂(BPCA)给药,用于脑肿瘤患者手术前后。我们还旨在将我们的结果与基于血氧水平依赖(BOLD)对比的 fMRI 技术的结果进行比较。
对于我们的 14 名肿瘤患者(4 名术前,10 名术后神经外科干预)中的每一位,我们都获得了:静脉注射 BPCA(0.03mmol/kg)后 T1-3D GRE 序列(TR=2.6ms/TE=1.1ms/FA=10°),以及 T2*EPI 序列(TR=3s/TE=50ms/FA=90°)。在两次功能运行期间,都进行了运动和/或触觉阻断型范式。使用 SPM5 软件进行分析。
两种功能技术的最大激活均定位于相同区域。在术前和术后患者组之间,位于初级运动皮层的激活的计算 t 值没有观察到显著差异(在相同的功能技术中)。T2*EPI 检查的平均值分别为 10.84 和 9.36。T1 技术的平均 t 值较低,尤其是术后患者(分别为 5.83 和 3.9)。
T1 技术可用于检测脑肿瘤患者手术前后的功能区域。该技术可评估在使用 T2*BOLD 技术时因磁化率伪影而受到影响的皮质中心。两种技术都发现的激活具有相同的定位,T1 技术的激活值较低。