Department of Podiatry and Musculoskeletal Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, 3086, Australia.
La Trobe Rural Health School and Musculoskeletal Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, PO Box 199, Victoria, 3552, Australia.
J Foot Ankle Res. 2010 Dec 22;3:31. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-3-31.
The Ankle Brachial Index is a useful clinical test for establishing blood supply to the foot. However, there are limitations to this method when conducted on people with diabetes. As an alternative to the Ankle Brachial Index, measuring Toe Systolic Pressures and the Toe Brachial Index have been recommended to assess the arterial blood supply to the foot. This study aimed to determine the intra and inter-rater reliability of the measurement of Toe Systolic Pressure and the Toe Brachial Index in patients with diabetes using a manual measurement system.
This was a repeated measures, reliability study. Three raters measured Toe Systolic Pressure and the Toe Brachial Index in thirty participants with diabetes. Measurement sessions occurred on two occasions, one week apart, using a manual photoplethysmography unit (Hadeco Smartdop 45) and a standardised measurement protocol.
The mean intra-class correlation for intra-rater reliability for toe systolic pressures was 0.87 (95% LOA: -25.97 to 26.06 mmHg) and the mean intra-class correlation for Toe Brachial Indices was 0.75 (95% LOA: -0.22 to 0.28). The intra-class correlation for inter-rater reliability was 0.88 for toe systolic pressures (95% LOA: -22.91 to 29.17.mmHg) and 0.77 for Toe Brachial Indices (95% LOA: -0.21 to 0.22).
Despite the reasonable intra-class correlation results, the range of error (95% LOA) was broad. This raises questions regarding the reliability of using a manual sphygmomanometer and PPG for the Toe Systolic Pressure and Toe Brachial Indice.
踝肱指数是一种用于确定足部血液供应的有用临床测试。然而,对于糖尿病患者,这种方法存在局限性。作为踝肱指数的替代方法,已经建议测量趾收缩压和趾肱指数来评估足部的动脉血液供应。本研究旨在使用手动测量系统确定糖尿病患者趾收缩压和趾肱指数的测量的内部和内部可靠性。
这是一项重复测量可靠性研究。三名评估者使用手动光体积描记仪(Hadeco Smartdop 45)和标准化测量方案,在 30 名糖尿病患者中测量趾收缩压和趾肱指数。测量会议在两次不同的时间进行,间隔一周。
趾收缩压的内部评估者可靠性的平均组内相关系数为 0.87(95%置信区间:-25.97 至 26.06mmHg),趾肱指数的平均组内相关系数为 0.75(95%置信区间:-0.22 至 0.28)。内部评估者可靠性的组内相关系数为 0.88 的趾收缩压(95%置信区间:-22.91 至 29.17mmHg)和 0.77 的趾肱指数(95%置信区间:-0.21 至 0.22)。
尽管组内相关系数结果合理,但误差范围(95%置信区间)很广。这对使用手动血压计和 PPG 测量趾收缩压和趾肱指数的可靠性提出了质疑。