Departamento de Estomatologia, Universidade de São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Braz Oral Res. 2010 Oct-Dec;24(4):467-74. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242010000400016.
There are many limitations to image acquisition, using conventional radiography, of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) region. The Computed Tomography (CT) scan is a better option, due to its higher accuracy, for purposes of diagnosis, surgical planning and treatment of bone injuries. The aim of the present study was to analyze two protocols of cone beam computed tomography for the evaluation of simulated mandibular condyle bone lesions. Spherical lesions were simulated in 30 dry mandibular condyles, using dentist drills and drill bits sizes 1, 3 and 6. Each of the mandibular condyles was submitted to cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) using two protocols: 1) axial, coronal and sagittal multiplanar reconstruction (MPR); and 2) sagittal plus coronal slices throughout the longitudinal axis of the mandibular condyles. For these protocols, 2 observers analyzed the CBCT images independently, regarding the presence or not of injuries. Only one of the observers, however, performed on 2 different occasions. The results were compared to the gold standard, evaluating the percentage of agreement, degree of accuracy of CBCT protocols and observers' examination. The z test was used for the statistical analysis. The results showed there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 protocols. There was greater difficulty in the assessment of small-size simulated lesions (drill # 1). From the results of this study, it can be concluded that CBCT is an accurate tool for analyzing mandibular condyle bone lesions, with the MPR protocol showing slightly better results than the sagittal plus coronal slices throughout the longitudinal axis.
在颞下颌关节(TMJ)区域,使用传统的放射线照相术进行图像采集存在许多局限性。由于其更高的准确性,计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描是用于诊断、手术计划和治疗骨损伤的更好选择。本研究的目的是分析两种锥形束 CT 协议,用于评估模拟下颌骨髁骨病变。使用牙医钻头和钻头尺寸 1、3 和 6,在 30 个干燥的下颌骨髁上模拟了球形病变。每个下颌骨髁都使用两种协议进行了锥形束 CT(CBCT)扫描:1)轴向、冠状和矢状多平面重建(MPR);2)矢状加冠状切片贯穿下颌骨髁的纵轴。对于这些方案,2 名观察者独立分析了 CBCT 图像,以确定是否存在损伤。然而,只有一名观察者在 2 个不同的场合进行了检查。将结果与金标准进行比较,评估 CBCT 协议和观察者检查的一致性百分比、准确性程度。使用 z 检验进行统计分析。结果表明,两种方案之间没有统计学上的显著差异。对于模拟的小尺寸病变(钻头 # 1),评估难度更大。从这项研究的结果可以得出结论,CBCT 是分析下颌骨髁骨病变的一种准确工具,MPR 协议的结果略优于贯穿髁骨纵轴的矢状加冠状切片。