Suppr超能文献

[妊娠期糖尿病筛查的相关性以及选择性策略与普遍策略的比较]

[Relevance of gestational diabetes mellitus screening and comparison of selective with universal strategies].

作者信息

Hiéronimus S, Le Meaux J-P

机构信息

Hôpital l'Archet, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Nice, Service d'endocrinologie-maladies métaboliques-médecine de la reproduction, 06202 Nice, France.

出版信息

J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2010 Dec;39(8 Suppl 2):S200-13. doi: 10.1016/S0368-2315(10)70047-8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the relevance of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening policy and to compare selective with universal screening.

METHODS

Systematic review of all French and English languages publications in Medline and Cochrane Databases, published since 1990.

RESULTS

Maternal hyperglycemia is associated with increased maternal and neonatal complications. The 75 g OGTT (Oral Glucose Tolerance Test) is a valid and reliable test for GDM diagnosis. Treatment of GDM reduces perinatal complications. Selective screening allows to limit false positive rate and to concentrate medical resources. Nevertheless, screening might be more difficult to perform and lead to miss up to 45% of GDM cases. Universal screening offers higher sensitivity but leads to more therapeutic interventions whose benefit and cost/efficiency ratio need to be estimated in low risk women.

CONCLUSION

The benefits of GDM screening and treatment have only been proven for women with GDM risk factors. Their relevance in women without risk factor remains controversial.

摘要

目的

评估妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)筛查策略的相关性,并比较选择性筛查与普遍性筛查。

方法

对自1990年以来发表在Medline和Cochrane数据库中的所有法语和英语出版物进行系统评价。

结果

母体高血糖与母婴并发症增加有关。75克口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)是诊断GDM的有效且可靠的检测方法。GDM的治疗可减少围产期并发症。选择性筛查可降低假阳性率并集中医疗资源。然而,筛查可能更难实施,导致高达45%的GDM病例漏诊。普遍性筛查具有更高的敏感性,但会导致更多的治疗干预,其益处和成本效益比需要在低风险女性中进行评估。

结论

GDM筛查和治疗的益处仅在具有GDM危险因素的女性中得到证实。其在无危险因素女性中的相关性仍存在争议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验