Center for Evaluation and Research, University of California, Davis, 1616 DaVinci Ct., Davis, CA 95618, USA.
J Community Health. 2011 Aug;36(4):616-23. doi: 10.1007/s10900-010-9350-6.
Although California communities have been relatively successful in adopting and implementing a wide range of local tobacco control policies, the process has not been without its setbacks and barriers. Little is known about local policy adoption, and this paper examines these processes related to adopting and implementing outdoor smoke-free policies, focusing on the major barriers faced by local-level tobacco control organizations in this process. Ninety-six projects funded by the California Tobacco Control Program submitted final evaluation reports pertaining to an outdoor smoking objective, and the reports from these projects were analyzed. The barriers were grouped in three primary areas: politically polarizing barriers, organizational barriers, and local political orientation. The barriers identified in this study underscore the need for an organized action plan in adopting local tobacco policy. The authors also suggest potential strategies to offset the barriers, including: (1) having a "champion" who helps to carry an objective forward; (2) tapping into a pool of youth volunteers; (3) collecting and using local data as a persuasive tool; (4) educating the community in smoke-free policy efforts; (5) working strategically within the local political climate; and (6) demonstrating to policymakers the constituent support for proposed policy.
尽管加利福尼亚社区在采用和实施广泛的地方烟草控制政策方面相对成功,但这一过程并非没有挫折和障碍。对于地方政策的采用知之甚少,本文探讨了与采用和实施户外无烟政策相关的这些过程,重点关注地方烟草控制组织在这一过程中面临的主要障碍。由加利福尼亚烟草控制计划资助的 96 个项目提交了与户外吸烟目标相关的最终评估报告,对这些项目的报告进行了分析。这些障碍分为三个主要领域:政治上两极分化的障碍、组织障碍和地方政治倾向。本研究中确定的障碍突出表明需要制定一个有组织的行动计划来采用地方烟草政策。作者还提出了潜在的策略来克服这些障碍,包括:(1)有一个“拥护者”来帮助推动目标的实现;(2)利用青年志愿者资源;(3)收集和使用当地数据作为有说服力的工具;(4)教育社区了解无烟政策工作;(5)在当地政治氛围中进行策略性工作;(6)向政策制定者展示选民对拟议政策的支持。