Suppr超能文献

采用和实施地方层面烟草控制政策的障碍。

Barriers to adopting and implementing local-level tobacco control policies.

机构信息

Center for Evaluation and Research, University of California, Davis, 1616 DaVinci Ct., Davis, CA 95618, USA.

出版信息

J Community Health. 2011 Aug;36(4):616-23. doi: 10.1007/s10900-010-9350-6.

Abstract

Although California communities have been relatively successful in adopting and implementing a wide range of local tobacco control policies, the process has not been without its setbacks and barriers. Little is known about local policy adoption, and this paper examines these processes related to adopting and implementing outdoor smoke-free policies, focusing on the major barriers faced by local-level tobacco control organizations in this process. Ninety-six projects funded by the California Tobacco Control Program submitted final evaluation reports pertaining to an outdoor smoking objective, and the reports from these projects were analyzed. The barriers were grouped in three primary areas: politically polarizing barriers, organizational barriers, and local political orientation. The barriers identified in this study underscore the need for an organized action plan in adopting local tobacco policy. The authors also suggest potential strategies to offset the barriers, including: (1) having a "champion" who helps to carry an objective forward; (2) tapping into a pool of youth volunteers; (3) collecting and using local data as a persuasive tool; (4) educating the community in smoke-free policy efforts; (5) working strategically within the local political climate; and (6) demonstrating to policymakers the constituent support for proposed policy.

摘要

尽管加利福尼亚社区在采用和实施广泛的地方烟草控制政策方面相对成功,但这一过程并非没有挫折和障碍。对于地方政策的采用知之甚少,本文探讨了与采用和实施户外无烟政策相关的这些过程,重点关注地方烟草控制组织在这一过程中面临的主要障碍。由加利福尼亚烟草控制计划资助的 96 个项目提交了与户外吸烟目标相关的最终评估报告,对这些项目的报告进行了分析。这些障碍分为三个主要领域:政治上两极分化的障碍、组织障碍和地方政治倾向。本研究中确定的障碍突出表明需要制定一个有组织的行动计划来采用地方烟草政策。作者还提出了潜在的策略来克服这些障碍,包括:(1)有一个“拥护者”来帮助推动目标的实现;(2)利用青年志愿者资源;(3)收集和使用当地数据作为有说服力的工具;(4)教育社区了解无烟政策工作;(5)在当地政治氛围中进行策略性工作;(6)向政策制定者展示选民对拟议政策的支持。

相似文献

1
Barriers to adopting and implementing local-level tobacco control policies.
J Community Health. 2011 Aug;36(4):616-23. doi: 10.1007/s10900-010-9350-6.
4
Towards stronger tobacco control policies to curb the smoking epidemic in Spain.
Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Jul;26(7):1561-1569. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03385-9. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
7
State adoption of 100% smoke-free acute non federal hospital campus policies.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009 Nov;6(11):2793-9. doi: 10.3390/ijerph6112793. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
8
A qualitative evaluation of 40 voluntary, smoke-free, multiunit, housing policy campaigns in California.
Tob Control. 2014 Nov;23(6):491-5. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050923. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
9
Smoke free health care: an organisational change to increase effective intervention for tobacco.
N S W Public Health Bull. 2008 Mar-Apr;19(3-4):60-4. doi: 10.1071/nb07115.
10
Local restaurant smoking policy enactment in Massachusetts.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999 Jan;5(1):63-73. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199901000-00010.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences of policy-advisors in capacity, opportunity and motivation for implementing local tobacco control.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 23;24(1):3569. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21099-z.
2
Formulating tobacco control policies: How can local governments contribute?
Tob Prev Cessat. 2024 Oct 17;10. doi: 10.18332/tpc/191844. eCollection 2024.
5
State of the literature discussing smoke-free policies globally: A narrative review.
Tob Induc Dis. 2024 Jan 5;22. doi: 10.18332/tid/174781. eCollection 2024.
6
Capacity of enforcers and level of enforcement of the Tobacco Control Act 2015 in Kampala, Uganda.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Sep 22;3(9):e0002390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002390. eCollection 2023.
7
Non-communicable disease policy implementation in Libya: A mixed methods assessment.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Nov 10;2(11):e0000615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000615. eCollection 2022.
8
Public support for car smoking bans in Poland: a 2022 national cross-sectional survey.
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 10;12(10):e066247. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066247.
9
Tobacco Control as an LGBTQ+ Issue: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Recommendations from LGBTQ+ Community Leaders.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 22;18(11):5546. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115546.

本文引用的文献

1
The quarter that changed the world.
Tob Control. 2010 Apr;19 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i3-15. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.030809.
2
Policy-driven tobacco control.
Tob Control. 2010 Apr;19 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i16-20. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.030718.
3
Public policy involvement by health commissioners.
J Community Health. 2009 Aug;34(4):239-45. doi: 10.1007/s10900-009-9158-4.
4
The diffusion and impact of clean indoor air laws.
Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:171-85. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090920.
5
Effect of smoke-free laws on bar value and profits.
Am J Public Health. 2007 Aug;97(8):1400-2. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.095315. Epub 2007 Jun 28.
6
Real-time measurement of outdoor tobacco smoke particles.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2007 May;57(5):522-34. doi: 10.3155/1047-3289.57.5.522.
7
Individual rights advocacy in tobacco control policies: an assessment and recommendation.
Tob Control. 2005 Aug;14 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii31-7. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.008060.
9
Economic effect of restaurant smoking restrictions on restaurant business in Massachusetts, 1992 to 1998.
Tob Control. 2002 Jun;11 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii38-42. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_2.ii38.
10
Passive smoking and the risk of coronary heart disease--a meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies.
N Engl J Med. 1999 Mar 25;340(12):920-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199903253401204.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验