Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Clin Ther. 2010 Sep;32(10):1713-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.09.008.
The optimal treatment for bloodstream infections (BSIs) with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) is unknown.
This study examined outcomes in patients treated with daptomycin or linezolid for VRE BSI.
A retrospective, multicenter, cohort study was performed via chart review. Hospitalized patients treated for VRE BSI with daptomycin or linezolid from September 1, 2003, to June 30, 2007, were identified via pharmacy and microbiology reports at each institution. Patients aged <18 years or with polymicrobial bacteremia were excluded from analysis. Linezolid and daptomycin were included because the participating institutions used either of the 2 agents as first-line treatment for VRE BSI. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the effect of drug selection on mortality and duration of BSI. Duration of BSI was defined as the amount of time from the draw date of the first positive blood culture to the draw date of the first finalized negative blood culture. Adverse events were not assessed.
One-hundred one patients from 3 participating US hospitals experiencing VRE BSI were identified. Sixty-seven patients were treated with daptomycin and 34 with linezolid. Baseline characteristics appeared comparable between the daptomycin- and linezolidtreated groups, with the exception of shock (P = 0.049), prior vancomycin treatment (P = 0.002), and prior linezolid treatment (P < 0.001), all of which occurred significantly more often in daptomycin-treated patients. Inpatient mortality occurred in 31 daptomycin- and 10 linezolid-treated patients (46.3% vs 29.4%; P = NS). Linear regression found that shock (P = 0.015), infective endocarditis (P = 0.021), and concurrent rifampin or gentamicin treatment (P = 0.01) were associated with prolonged duration of positive cultures. Logistic regression revealed that shock (odds ratio [OR] = 14.24; P = 0.008), infection with Enterococcus faecium (OR = 53.10; P = 0.024), previous linezolid treatment (OR = 6.63; P = 0.031), concurrent rifampin or gentamicin treatment (OR = 6.48; P = 0.046), and a nonline source of infection (OR = 6.67; P = 0.019) were associated with increased mortality.
In this retrospective cohort analysis, there were no significant differences in mortality of VRE BSI between patients receiving daptomycin or linezolid. Underlying comorbidities appeared to best predict outcome; however, given the retrospective nature of this study, larger, prospective, randomized, comparative studies are needed to control for potential biases and determine definitive outcome differences between these 2 antimicrobials.
万古霉素耐药肠球菌(VRE)血流感染的最佳治疗方法尚不清楚。
本研究旨在探讨达托霉素或利奈唑胺治疗 VRE 血流感染患者的结局。
采用回顾性、多中心队列研究方法,通过各机构的病历和微生物学报告进行图表审查。2003 年 9 月 1 日至 2007 年 6 月 30 日,每个机构均根据药房和微生物学报告确定接受达托霉素或利奈唑胺治疗 VRE 血流感染的住院患者。排除年龄<18 岁或合并多微生物菌血症的患者。选择利奈唑胺和达托霉素是因为参与研究的机构将这两种药物中的任何一种均作为 VRE 血流感染的一线治疗药物。采用单变量和多变量分析来确定药物选择对死亡率和血流感染持续时间的影响。血流感染持续时间定义为从首次阳性血培养抽取日期到首次最终阴性血培养抽取日期的时间。未评估不良事件。
从美国 3 家参与研究的医院中确定了 101 例 VRE 血流感染患者。67 例患者接受达托霉素治疗,34 例患者接受利奈唑胺治疗。达托霉素和利奈唑胺治疗组之间的基线特征似乎相似,但休克(P=0.049)、既往万古霉素治疗(P=0.002)和既往利奈唑胺治疗(P<0.001)存在差异,所有这些在达托霉素治疗组中更为常见。31 例达托霉素治疗患者和 10 例利奈唑胺治疗患者发生院内死亡(46.3% vs 29.4%;P=NS)。线性回归发现休克(P=0.015)、感染性心内膜炎(P=0.021)和同时使用利福平或庆大霉素治疗(P=0.01)与阳性培养持续时间延长相关。逻辑回归显示休克(比值比[OR]=14.24;P=0.008)、粪肠球菌感染(OR=53.10;P=0.024)、既往利奈唑胺治疗(OR=6.63;P=0.031)、同时使用利福平或庆大霉素治疗(OR=6.48;P=0.046)和非线源感染(OR=6.67;P=0.019)与死亡率增加相关。
在本回顾性队列分析中,接受达托霉素或利奈唑胺治疗的 VRE 血流感染患者的死亡率无显著差异。基础合并症似乎是预测结局的最佳因素;然而,鉴于本研究的回顾性性质,需要更大规模、前瞻性、随机、对照研究来控制潜在偏倚,并确定这两种抗菌药物之间的明确结局差异。