Department of Neurology, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan; Kansai Rehabilitation College, Hyogo, Japan.
J Neurol Sci. 2011 Mar 15;302(1-2):29-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2010.12.007. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
Recently, new electrophysiological ALS criteria incorporating fasciculation potentials (FPs) as evidence for lower motor neuron signs (Awaji Criteria (AC)) was proposed to provide earlier detection of early-stage ALS than revised El Escorial electrophysiological criteria (REEC). However, serial electrophysiological analysis is lacking to ascertain the original intention. The objective for this study was to elucidate whether electrophysiological criteria set for AC detects ALS earlier than REEC's counterpart in patients with ALS.
Of the 51 patients who were clinically suspected of ALS, 35 patients prospectively received serial electrophysiological studies every 3 months until (1) both electrophysiological AC and REEC criteria were met in more than two muscles representing both of the cervical and lumbosacral segments or (2) either clinically definite or clinically probable REEC criteria was met. The intervals were determined between the initial disease onset and when the respective electrophysiological criteria were met.
Electrophysiological diagnostic criteria were met in 94.3% by AC and 40% by REEC at the initial visits. The intervals between the disease onset and the time of meeting the electrophysiological criteria were shorter in AC (mean: 9.0 months) than in REEC (mean: 15.2 months) (P<0.01). Eleven patients who met only AC electrophysiological criteria on the initial study subsequently met REEC electrophysiological criteria with the mean interval of 3.8 months. A higher percentage of bulbar-type ALS (83.3%) met AC than limb-onset ALS (43.4%) (P<0.05). FPs tended to be more frequently observed than fib/psw in the muscles outside the region of initial clinical onset.
Electrophysiological criteria of AC were met earlier than that of REEC in ALS patients, especially in patients with bulbar onset. Early recognition of ALS by AC may allow effective therapeutic intervention in the early disease stage.
最近,新的肌电图 ALS 标准纳入了肌束震颤电位(FPs)作为运动神经元下体征的证据(Awaji 标准(AC)),旨在比修订后的 El Escorial 电生理标准(REEC)更早地检测早期 ALS。然而,缺乏连续的电生理分析来确定其初衷。本研究的目的是阐明 AC 的电生理标准是否比 ALS 的 REEC 标准更早地检测到 ALS。
51 例临床疑似 ALS 的患者前瞻性地接受了每 3 个月的连续电生理研究,直到(1)两个颈椎和腰骶段的肌肉都有超过两个以上的肌肉符合 AC 的电生理标准和 REEC 的标准,或者(2)符合临床明确或临床可能的 REEC 标准。初始发病和满足相应电生理标准之间的间隔时间被确定。
AC 的电生理诊断标准在初始就诊时的符合率为 94.3%,而 REEC 的符合率为 40%。AC(平均:9.0 个月)满足电生理标准的时间间隔比 REEC(平均:15.2 个月)更短(P<0.01)。在初始研究中仅符合 AC 电生理标准的 11 例患者随后符合 REEC 电生理标准,平均间隔时间为 3.8 个月。83.3%的延髓型 ALS 符合 AC 标准,而四肢型 ALS 仅为 43.4%(P<0.05)。在初始临床发病区域以外的肌肉中,FPs 比 fib/psw 更频繁地出现。
AC 的电生理标准比 REEC 更早地在 ALS 患者中得到满足,尤其是在延髓型 ALS 患者中。通过 AC 早期识别 ALS 可能允许在疾病早期进行有效的治疗干预。