An open label, non-randomized, prospective clinical trial evaluating the immunogenicity of branded enoxaparin versus biosimilars in healthy volunteers.

INTRODUCTION

Compositional variations among biosimilar enoxaparin could lead to a differential immunogenic response between these preparations.

METHODS

Enoxaparin (Clexane, n = 110) and a biosimilar version (Cutenox, n = 110) were administered to healthy volunteers in Brazil, 40 mg subcutaneous (SQ), daily, for 10 days. Blood was collected at baseline, days 1 and 10, and analyzed for antiheparin/PF4 antibody (AHPF4 antibodies) titers and subtypes by enzyme-linked-immunosorbent serologic assay (ELISA).

RESULTS

Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) treatment resulted in AHPF4 antibodies generation, with differences on day 10 (P < .05). Antibody subtyping (immunoglobulin [Ig] G, IgA, IgM) demonstrated different profiles between LMWH with statistical significance for IgG (Clexane 10 = 0.21 ± 0.06, Cutenox 10 = 0.28 ± 0.10, P < .0001) and IgA (Clexane 10 = 0.15 ± 0.02, versus Cutenox 10 = 0.13 ± 0.02, P < .0001) on day 10, with a significant drug effect (P < .0001) and significant time by drug interaction (P = .0009). All antibody titers were stated in terms of optical density (OD) units.

CONCLUSION

LMWHs immunogenic potential varies to generate AHPF4 antibodies and subtypes and cross-reactivity with preformed antibodies. Such parameters may be useful in defining the biosimilar LMWHs bioequivalence. Future studies evaluating the immunogenicity of biosimilar drugs are warranted.