New England Baptist Hospital, 125 Parker Hill Ave, Boston, MA 02120, USA.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Jul;19(7):792-800. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.12.010. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
The number of effective knee osteoarthritis (OA) interventions, especially those tailored to specific compartmental involvement, are small. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of a realigning patellofemoral (PF) brace in improving pain and function among persons with symptomatic lateral PF OA.
We conducted a double blind, randomized crossover trial of a realigning PF brace for persons with lateral PF OA. Participants had lateral PF OA with anterior knee symptoms on most days of the month, lateral PF joint space narrowing, and radiographic evidence of a definite osteophyte in the PF joint. We compared two treatments: (1) Control treatment consisting of a BioSkin Q Brace with patellar realigning strap removed; and (2) Active treatment consisting of a realigning BioSkin Q Brace with the strap applied. For each participant, the trial lasted 18 weeks, including 6 weeks each of active and control treatment period separated by a 6-week washout period. The order of treatments was randomized. The primary outcome was change in knee pain on the visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included WOMAC pain, function, and stiffness. An unstructured correlation matrix for observations within participants was used in generalized estimating equation fitting to derive a linear regression model that expressed the relation between the intervention and change in VAS pain.
80 participants (63 F) with a mean age and body mass index of 61 years and 28 kg/m(2), respectively, were randomized by order of treatment. A model examining the main effects for change in VAS knee pain (0-100) demonstrated no significant treatment effect (-0.68 VAS units, 95% CI: -6.2, 4.8 units, P=0.81) and no differential carryover effect. There was also no significant difference between active and control treatments for WOMAC pain, function, or stiffness outcomes.
The effects of a specific realigning PF brace are not of clinical or statistical significance.
膝关节骨关节炎(OA)的有效干预措施数量较少,特别是针对特定部位受累的干预措施。本研究旨在确定矫正髌股(PF)支具在改善有症状外侧 PF OA 患者疼痛和功能方面的疗效。
我们对患有外侧 PF OA 的患者进行了一项双盲、随机交叉试验,这些患者在大多数日子里都有前膝症状、外侧 PF 关节间隙变窄,以及 PF 关节有明确的骨赘的放射学证据。我们比较了两种治疗方法:(1)对照治疗,包括去除髌带的 BioSkin Q 支具;(2)主动治疗,包括应用髌带的矫正 BioSkin Q 支具。每位参与者的试验持续 18 周,包括主动和对照治疗各 6 周,其间间隔 6 周洗脱期。治疗顺序随机。主要结局是视觉模拟评分(VAS)上膝关节疼痛的变化。次要结局包括 WOMAC 疼痛、功能和僵硬。使用参与者内观察的非结构化相关矩阵,在广义估计方程拟合中得出线性回归模型,表达干预与 VAS 疼痛变化之间的关系。
80 名参与者(63 名女性)的平均年龄和体重指数分别为 61 岁和 28kg/m²,他们按照治疗顺序进行了随机分组。一个检查 VAS 膝关节疼痛(0-100)变化的主要效果的模型显示,治疗效果无显著差异(-0.68 VAS 单位,95%CI:-6.2,4.8 单位,P=0.81),也没有明显的交叉效应。在 WOMAC 疼痛、功能或僵硬结局方面,主动治疗与对照治疗也没有显著差异。
特定矫正 PF 支具的效果没有临床或统计学意义。