Suppr超能文献

颈动脉管壁成像中双反转恢复 TFE 与 TSE 序列的对比分析。

A comparative analysis of double inversion recovery TFE and TSE sequences on carotid artery wall imaging.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Liaocheng People's Hospital and Liaocheng Clinical School of Taishan Medical University, Liaocheng, Shandong 252000, PR China.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Feb;81(2):223-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.048. Epub 2011 Jan 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the characteristics of double inversion recovery (DIR) turbo field echo (TFE) and turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences and explore the value of double inversion recovery TFE sequence on carotid artery wall imaging.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

56 patients (32 males and 24 females, aged 31-76 years with a mean age of 53 years) were performed with DIR TFE and DIR TSE T1 weighted imaging (T1WI) sequences on carotid artery bifurcations. Image quality acquired by different techniques were evaluated and scored by two physicians. Whether there is significant difference is determined by SPSS 11.0 software. Paired-samples t test was used for statistics.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the image quality scores between two sequences (t = 0.880, P = 0.383 > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

DIR TFE sequence has short scanning time and high spatial resolution. DIR TFE sequence can be used as the preferred sequence for screening carotid atherosclerotic plaque compared with DIR TSE sequence.

摘要

目的

分析双反转恢复(DIR)涡轮场回波(TFE)和涡轮自旋回波(TSE)序列的特点,探讨双反转恢复 TFE 序列在颈动脉管壁成像中的应用价值。

方法

对 56 例患者(男 32 例,女 24 例,年龄 31-76 岁,平均 53 岁)行颈动脉分叉处 DIR TFE 和 DIR TSE T1 加权成像(T1WI)检查。由两位医师对不同技术获得的图像质量进行评估和评分。采用 SPSS 11.0 软件判断是否存在统计学差异。配对样本 t 检验进行统计学分析。

结果

两种序列的图像质量评分无显著差异(t = 0.880,P = 0.383>0.05)。

结论

DIR TFE 序列扫描时间短,空间分辨率高。与 DIR TSE 序列相比,DIR TFE 序列可作为筛查颈动脉粥样硬化斑块的首选序列。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验