Fellin Rebecca E, Manal Kurt, Davis Irene S
Biomechanics and Movement Science Program, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
J Appl Biomech. 2010 Nov;26(4):407-14. doi: 10.1123/jab.26.4.407.
Researchers conduct gait analyses utilizing both overground and treadmill modes of running. Previous studies comparing these modes analyzed discrete variables. Recently, techniques involving quantitative pattern analysis have assessed kinematic curve similarity in gait. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare hip, knee and rearfoot 3-D kinematics between overground and treadmill running using quantitative kinematic curve analysis. Twenty runners ran at 3.35 m/s ± 5% during treadmill and overground conditions while right lower extremity kinematics were recorded. Kinematics of the hip, knee and rearfoot at footstrike and peak were compared using intraclass correlation coefficients. Kinematic curves during stance phase were compared using the trend symmetry method within each subject. The overall average trend symmetry was high, 0.94 (1.0 is perfect symmetry) between running modes. The transverse plane and knee frontal plane exhibited lower similarity (0.86-0.90). Other than a 4.5 degree reduction in rearfoot dorsiflexion at footstrike during treadmill running, all differences were ≤1.5 degrees. 17/18 discrete variables exhibited modest correlations (>0.6) and 8/18 exhibited strong correlations (>0.8). In conclusion, overground and treadmill running kinematic curves were generally similar when averaged across subjects. Although some subjects exhibited differences in transverse plane curves, overall, treadmill running was representative of overground running for most subjects.
研究人员利用地面跑步和跑步机跑步两种模式进行步态分析。以往比较这两种模式的研究分析的是离散变量。最近,涉及定量模式分析的技术已用于评估步态中的运动学曲线相似度。因此,本研究的目的是使用定量运动学曲线分析,比较地面跑步和跑步机跑步时的髋、膝和后足三维运动学特征。20名跑步者在跑步机和地面条件下以3.35米/秒±5%的速度跑步,同时记录右下肢的运动学数据。使用组内相关系数比较触地和峰值时髋、膝和后足的运动学特征。在每个受试者中,使用趋势对称法比较站立期的运动学曲线。两种跑步模式之间的总体平均趋势对称度较高,为0.94(1.0为完美对称)。横断面和膝部额状面的相似度较低(0.86 - 0.90)。除了跑步机跑步时触地瞬间后足背屈角度减小4.5度外,所有差异均≤1.5度。17/18个离散变量呈现中等相关性(>0.6),8/18个呈现强相关性(>0.8)。总之,当对受试者进行平均时,地面跑步和跑步机跑步的运动学曲线总体相似。尽管一些受试者在横断面曲线中表现出差异,但总体而言,跑步机跑步对大多数受试者来说可代表地面跑步。