Departamento de Produção Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia-UNESP, Botucatu-SP 18618-000, Brazil.
Theriogenology. 2011 Apr 1;75(6):1153-60. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.11.027. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
The objective was to compare two protocols for synchronizing ovulation in lactating Holstein cows submitted to timed AI (TAI) or timed ET (TET). Within each farm (n = 8), cows (n = 883; mean ± SEM 166.24 ± 3.27 d postpartum, yielding 36.8 ± 0.34 kg of milk/d) were randomly assigned to receive either: 1) an intravaginal progesterone insert (CIDR®) with 1.9 g of progesterone + GnRH on Day -10, CIDR® withdrawal + PGF2α on Day -3, and 1 mg estradiol cypionate on Day -2 (treatment GP-P-E; n(TAI) = 180; n(TET) = 260); or 2) a CIDR® insert + 2 mg estradiol benzoate on Day -10, PGF2α on Day -3, CIDR® withdrawal + 1 mg estradiol cypionate on Day -2 (treatment EP-P-E; n(TAI) = 174; n(TET) = 269). Cows were subsequently randomly assigned to receive either TAI on Day 0 or TET on Day 7. Serum progesterone concentration on Day -3 was greater in GP-P-E than in EP-P-E (2.89 ± 0.15 vs 2.29 ± 0.15 ng/mL; P < 0.01), with no significant effect of group on serum progesterone on Day 7. Compared to cows submitted to TAI, those submitted to TET had greater pregnancy rates on Day 28 (44.0% [233/529] vs 29.7% [105/354]; P < 0.001) and on Day 60 (37.6% [199/529] vs 26.5 [94/354]; P < 0.001). However, there were no effects of treatments (GP-P-E vs EP-P-E; P > 0.10) on synchronization (87.0% [383/440] vs 85.3% [378/443]), conception (TAI: 35.3% [55/156] vs 33.8% [50/148]; TET: 50.7% [115/227] vs 51.3% [118/230]) and pregnancy rates on Days 28 (TAI: 30.5% [55/180] vs 28.7% [50/174]; TET: 44.2% [115/260] vs 43.9% [118/269]) and 60 (TAI: 27.2% [49/80] vs 25.9% [45/174]; TET: 38.8% [101/260] vs 36.4% [98/269]). In conclusion, GP-P-E increased serum progesterone concentrations on Day -3, but rates of synchronization, conception, and pregnancy were not significantly different between cows submitted to GP-P-E and EP-P-E protocols, regardless of whether they were inseminated or received an embryo.
本研究旨在比较两种方案对泌乳荷斯坦奶牛进行同期发情处理,方案一是定时人工授精(TAI)或定时胚胎移植(TET),方案二是阴道内孕酮释放装置(CIDR®)结合 GnRH(-10 天)、PGF2α(-3 天)和雌二醇(-2 天)。结果表明,与 EP-P-E 方案相比,GP-P-E 方案在-3 天血清孕酮浓度更高(2.89 ± 0.15 对 2.29 ± 0.15 ng/mL;P < 0.01),但两组在第 7 天血清孕酮浓度上无显著差异。与 TAI 相比,TET 方案的妊娠率在第 28 天(44.0% [233/529] 对 29.7% [105/354];P < 0.001)和第 60 天(37.6% [199/529] 对 26.5% [94/354];P < 0.001)更高,但两组之间无显著差异。此外,GP-P-E 和 EP-P-E 两种方案在同期发情(87.0% [383/440] 对 85.3% [378/443])、受孕(TAI:35.3% [55/156] 对 33.8% [50/148];TET:50.7% [115/227] 对 51.3% [118/230])和妊娠率(TAI:30.5% [55/180] 对 28.7% [50/174];TET:44.2% [115/260] 对 43.9% [118/269])上均无显著差异。总之,GP-P-E 方案可以提高奶牛在-3 天的血清孕酮浓度,但无论是接受人工授精还是胚胎移植,GP-P-E 和 EP-P-E 方案在同期发情、受孕和妊娠率方面没有显著差异。