Poropat Goran, Giljaca Vanja, Stimac Davor, Gluud Christian
Department of Gastroenterology, Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Kresimirova 42, Rijeka, Croatia, 51000.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19;2011(1):CD003626. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003626.pub2.
Primary sclerosing cholangitis is a progressive chronic cholestatic liver disease that usually leads to the development of cirrhosis. Studies evaluating bile acids in the treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis have shown a potential benefit of their use. However, no influence on patients survival and disease outcome has yet been proven.
To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of bile acids for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.
We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Science Citation Index Expanded generally from inception through to October 2010.
Randomised clinical trials comparing any dose of bile acids or duration of treatment versus placebo, no intervention, or another intervention were included irrespective of blinding, language, or publication status.
Two authors extracted data independently. We evaluated the risk of bias of the trials using prespecified domains. We performed the meta-analysis according to the intention-to-treat principle. We presented outcomes as relative risks (RR) or mean differences (MD), both with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Eight trials evaluated ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo or no intervention (592 patients). The eight randomised clinical trials have a high risk of bias. Patients were treated for three months to six years (median three years). The dosage of ursodeoxycholic acid used in the trials ranged from low (10 mg/kg body weight/day) to high (28 to 30 mg/kg body weight/day). Ursodeoxycholic acid did not significantly reduce the risk of death (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.46 to 2.20); treatment failure including liver transplantation, varices, ascites, and encephalopathy (RR 1.22; 95% CI 0.91 to 1.64); liver histological deterioration (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.45 to 1.74); or liver cholangiographic deterioration (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.23 to 1.57). Ursodeoxycholic acid significantly improved serum bilirubin (MD -14.6 µmol/litre; 95% CI -18.7 to -10.6), alkaline phosphatases (MD -506 IU/litre; 95% CI -583 to -430), aspartate aminotransferase (MD -46 IU/litre; 95% CI -77 to -16), and gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase (MD -260 IU/litre; 95% CI -315 to -205), but not albumin (MD -0.20 g/litre; 95% CI -1.91 to 1.50). Ursodeoxycholic acid was safe and well tolerated by patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We did not find enough evidence to support or refute the use of bile acids in the treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis. However, bile acids seem to lead to a significant improvement in liver biochemistry. Therefore, more randomised trials are needed before any of the bile acids can be recommended for this indication.
原发性硬化性胆管炎是一种进行性慢性胆汁淤积性肝病,通常会导致肝硬化的发展。评估胆汁酸治疗原发性硬化性胆管炎的研究显示了其使用的潜在益处。然而,尚未证实对患者生存率和疾病转归有影响。
评估胆汁酸对原发性硬化性胆管炎患者的有益和有害作用。
我们检索了Cochrane肝胆组对照试验注册库、Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE、EMBASE和科学引文索引扩展版,检索时间一般从创刊至2010年10月。
纳入比较任何剂量胆汁酸或治疗持续时间与安慰剂、无干预或其他干预的随机临床试验,不考虑是否设盲、语言或发表状态。
两位作者独立提取数据。我们使用预先设定的领域评估试验的偏倚风险。我们根据意向性分析原则进行荟萃分析。我们将结果表示为相对风险(RR)或平均差(MD),两者均带有95%置信区间(CI)。
八项试验评估了熊去氧胆酸与安慰剂或无干预(592例患者)对比。这八项随机临床试验存在较高的偏倚风险。患者接受治疗3个月至6年(中位时间为3年)。试验中使用的熊去氧胆酸剂量范围从低剂量(10mg/(kg体重/天))到高剂量(28至30mg/(kg体重/天))。熊去氧胆酸未显著降低死亡风险(RR 1.00;95%CI 0.46至2.20);治疗失败包括肝移植、静脉曲张、腹水和肝性脑病(RR 1.22;95%CI 0.91至1.64);肝脏组织学恶化(RR 0.89;95%CI 0.45至1.74);或肝脏胆管造影恶化(RR 0.60;95%CI 0.23至1.57)。熊去氧胆酸显著改善了血清胆红素(MD -14.6µmol/升;95%CI -18.7至-10.6)、碱性磷酸酶(MD -506IU/升;95%CI -583至-430)、天冬氨酸转氨酶(MD -46IU/升;95%CI -77至-16)和γ-谷氨酰转肽酶(MD -260IU/升;95%CI -315至-205),但未改善白蛋白(MD -0.20g/升;95%CI -1.91至1.50)。原发性硬化性胆管炎患者对熊去氧胆酸耐受性良好且安全。
我们没有找到足够的证据支持或反驳胆汁酸用于治疗原发性硬化性胆管炎。然而,胆汁酸似乎能显著改善肝脏生化指标。因此,在推荐任何一种胆汁酸用于该适应证之前,需要更多的随机试验。