Department of Surgery, 10M, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Hernia. 2011 Jun;15(3):297-300. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0779-4. Epub 2011 Jan 23.
Incarceration of inguinal, umbilical and cicatricial hernias is a frequent problem. However, little is known about the relationship between the use of mesh and outcome after surgery. The goal of this study was to describe the relationship between the use of mesh in incarcerated hernia and the clinical outcome.
Correspondence, operation reports and patient files between January 1995 and December 2005 of patients presented at one academic and one teaching hospital in Rotterdam were searched for the following keywords: incarceration, strangulation and hernia. The patient characteristics, clinical presentation, pre-operative findings and clinical course were scored and analysed.
A total of 203 patients could be identified: 76 inguinal, 52 umbilical, 39 incisional, 14 epigastric, 14 femoral, five trocar and three spigelian hernias. In the statistical analysis, epigastric, femoral, trocar and spigelian hernias were pooled, due to their small group sizes. One patient was excluded from the analysis because the hernia was not corrected during operation. In total, 99 hernias were repaired using mesh versus 103 primary suture repairs. Twenty-five wound infections were registered (12.3%). One mesh was removed during a reintervention for anastomotic leakage, although no signs of wound infection were present. Nine patients died, none of them due to wound-related problems [one cardiovascular, one ruptured aneurysm, two anastomotic leakage, two sepsis e causa incognita (e.c.i.), three pulmonary complications]. Univariate analysis showed that female patients (P = 0.007), adipose patients (P = 0.016), patients with an umbilical hernia (P = 0.01) and patients who underwent a bowel resection (P = 0.015) had a significantly higher rate of wound infections. The type of repair (e.g. primary suture or mesh), use of antibiotic prophylaxis, gender, ASA class and age showed no significant relation with post-operative wound infection. After logistic regression analysis, only bowel resection (P = 0.020) showed a significant relation with post-operative wound infection.
Wound infection rates are high after the correction of acute hernia, but clinical consequences are relatively low. Mesh correction of an acute hernia seems to be safe and should be considered in every incarcerated hernia.
腹股沟疝、脐疝和瘢痕疝的嵌顿是一个常见的问题。然而,关于疝修补术中使用补片与术后结果的关系知之甚少。本研究的目的是描述嵌顿疝中使用补片与临床结果之间的关系。
检索 1995 年 1 月至 2005 年 12 月在鹿特丹的一家学术医院和一家教学医院就诊的患者的信件、手术报告和患者病历,搜索以下关键词:嵌顿、绞窄和疝。对患者特征、临床表现、术前发现和临床过程进行评分和分析。
共确定 203 例患者:76 例腹股沟疝,52 例脐疝,39 例切口疝,14 例上腹部疝,14 例股疝,5 例套管疝和 3 例 Spigelian 疝。在统计分析中,由于样本量较小,将上腹部疝、股疝、套管疝和 Spigelian 疝合并为一组。因术中未纠正疝而排除 1 例患者。共有 99 例疝采用补片修补,103 例采用原发性缝合修补。共记录 25 例伤口感染(12.3%)。1 例因吻合口漏而再次手术时取出 1 块补片,尽管没有发现伤口感染的迹象。9 例患者死亡,均与伤口无关[1 例心血管疾病,1 例破裂的动脉瘤,2 例吻合口漏,2 例败血症和原因不明(e.c.i.),3 例肺部并发症]。单因素分析显示,女性患者(P=0.007)、肥胖患者(P=0.016)、脐疝患者(P=0.01)和接受肠切除术的患者(P=0.015)的伤口感染率显著较高。修复类型(如原发性缝合或补片)、预防性使用抗生素、性别、ASA 分级和年龄与术后伤口感染无显著关系。经逻辑回归分析,只有肠切除术(P=0.020)与术后伤口感染有显著关系。
急性疝矫正后伤口感染率较高,但临床后果相对较低。急性疝修补术中使用补片是安全的,应考虑用于每例嵌顿疝。