Suppr超能文献

金钱并非万能:妻子的收入与家务时间。

Money Isn't Everything: Wives' Earnings and Housework Time.

机构信息

University of Michigan.

出版信息

Soc Sci Res. 2010 Nov;39(6):987-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.08.005.

Abstract

The autonomy perspective of housework time predicts that wives' housework time falls steadily as their earnings rise, because wives use additional financial resources to outsource or forego time in housework. We argue, however, that wives' ability to reduce their housework varies by household task. That is, we expect that increases in wives' earnings will allow them to forego or outsource some tasks, but not others. As a result, we hypothesize more rapid declines in wives' housework time for low-earning wives as their earnings increase than for high-earning wives who have already stopped performing household tasks that are the easiest and cheapest to outsource or forego. Using fixed-effects models and data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, we find considerable support for our hypothesis. We further conclude that past evidence that wives who out-earn their husbands spend additional time in housework to compensate for their gender-deviant success in the labor market is due to the failure to account for the non-linear relationship between wives' absolute earnings and their housework time.

摘要

家务时间的自主性观点预测,随着妻子收入的增加,妻子的家务时间会稳步下降,因为妻子会利用额外的财务资源来外包或放弃家务时间。然而,我们认为,妻子减少家务劳动的能力因家庭任务而异。也就是说,我们预计妻子收入的增加将使她们能够放弃或外包某些任务,但不是其他任务。因此,我们假设,随着收入较低的妻子收入的增加,她们的家务时间下降速度会比那些已经不再从事最容易和最便宜的外包或放弃的家务劳动的高收入妻子更快。利用固定效应模型和来自收入动态面板研究的数据,我们的假设得到了相当多的支持。我们进一步得出结论,过去有证据表明,丈夫收入超过妻子的妻子会花更多的时间在家务上,以弥补她们在劳动力市场上性别偏差的成功,这是由于没有考虑到妻子的绝对收入与其家务时间之间的非线性关系。

相似文献

1
Money Isn't Everything: Wives' Earnings and Housework Time.
Soc Sci Res. 2010 Nov;39(6):987-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.08.005.
2
Opting Out and Buying Out: Wives' Earnings and Housework Time.
J Marriage Fam. 2011 Apr;73(2):459-471. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00818.x.
4
Her earnings: Exploring variation in wives' earning contributions across six major Asian groups and Whites.
Soc Sci Res. 2015 Jul;52:539-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
5
Materialism, wives' relative earnings, and marital satisfaction among South Korean couples: Actor and partner effects.
J Fam Psychol. 2021 Sep;35(6):780-788. doi: 10.1037/fam0000872. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
6
Unemployment in Families: The Case of Housework.
J Marriage Fam. 2011 Oct 1;73(5):1085-1100. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00867.x.
7
Health and Housework in Later Life: A Longitudinal Study of Retired Couples.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Jan 1;75(1):184-194. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gby015.
8
Housework: Cause and consequence of gender ideology?
Soc Sci Res. 2013 Nov;42(6):1505-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
9
Infant care and wives' depressive symptoms.
Women Health. 1991;17(2):1-23. doi: 10.1300/J013v17n02_01.
10
Employment and Household Tasks of Japanese Couples, 1994-2009.
Demogr Res. 2012 Nov 20;27:705-718. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2012.27.24.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards an extended resource theory of marital power: parental education and household decision-making in rural China.
Eur Sociol Rev. 2023 Jun 9;40(5):802-819. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcad032. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Parenthood and the gender division of labour across the income distribution:: the relative importance of relative earnings.
Eur Sociol Rev. 2023 Apr;39(2):229-246. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcac036. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
3
Is There a Male-Breadwinner Norm? The Hazards of Inferring Preferences from Marriage Market Outcomes.
J Hum Resour. 2022 Nov;57(6):1885-1914. doi: 10.3368/jhr.58.2.0320-10803r1. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
4
"Thank U, Next"? Repartnering and the Household Division of Labor.
J Marriage Fam. 2022 Apr;84(2):636-654. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12816. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
5
Married Adults Coresiding with Older Parents: Implications for Paid Work and Domestic Workloads.
J Popul Ageing. 2021;14(4):507-535. doi: 10.1007/s12062-021-09346-2. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
6
Examining gender inequalities in factors associated with income poverty in Mexican rural households.
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 4;16(11):e0259187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259187. eCollection 2021.
7
Marriage and Masculinity: Male-Breadwinner Culture, Unemployment, and Separation Risk in 29 Countries.
Am Sociol Rev. 2021 Jun;86(3):465-502. doi: 10.1177/00031224211012442. Epub 2021 May 26.
8
Do managers sleep well? The role of gender, gender empowerment and economic development.
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 17;16(3):e0247515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247515. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
A theoretical look at the gender balance of power in the American couple.
J Fam Issues. 1989 Jun;10(2):225-50. doi: 10.1177/019251389010002005.
2
Determinants of household division of labor: resources, power, and ideology.
J Fam Issues. 1988 Jun;9(2):177-200. doi: 10.1177/019251388009002002.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验