Suppr超能文献

糖化血红蛋白在老年人中可能不能作为糖尿病敏感的决定因素。

HbA1c may not be a sensitive determinant of diabetic status in the elderly.

机构信息

Changi General Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011 May;92(2):e31-3. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Feb 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

American Diabetes Association (ADA) has recently recommended the use of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) to diagnose diabetes mellitus. We aim to determine if indeed this recommendation applies to the population in Singapore and whether it varies with age.

METHOD

This is a cross sectional study of 90 patients without previous history of diabetes who underwent screening and had both oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and HbA1c done at the same time. These patients were stratified into 4 age groups.

RESULT

We found that HbA1c of 6.2% is the best cut-off to diagnose diabetes using ROC curve analysis. At the specified HbA1c, the area under ROC curve (AUROC) reduces as age group increases suggesting that sensitivity and specificity of HbA1c as diagnostic marker reduces as age increases.

CONCLUSION

HbA1c has a low sensitivity to diagnose diabetes in older Asian subjects and caution is required when using HbA1c in isolation. This raises the possibility that a different cut-off value for different age groups may be more appropriate.

摘要

目的

美国糖尿病协会(ADA)最近建议使用糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)来诊断糖尿病。我们旨在确定该建议是否确实适用于新加坡人群,以及是否随年龄而变化。

方法

这是一项横断面研究,共纳入 90 名无糖尿病既往史的患者,他们同时进行口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)和 HbA1c 筛查,并按年龄分为 4 组。

结果

我们发现,使用 ROC 曲线分析,HbA1c 为 6.2%是诊断糖尿病的最佳截断值。在指定的 HbA1c 水平下,ROC 曲线下面积(AUROC)随年龄组的增加而降低,这表明 HbA1c 作为诊断标志物的敏感性和特异性随年龄的增加而降低。

结论

HbA1c 对老年亚洲人群诊断糖尿病的敏感性较低,因此单独使用 HbA1c 时需要谨慎。这提出了在不同年龄组使用不同截断值可能更合适的可能性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验